ArticlePloS one2011
A novel validation algorithm allows for automated cell tracking and the extraction of biologically meaningful parameters.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- MOLT: multi-object and lineage tracking in 2D and 3D biomedical time-series imaging.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Label-free live cell recognition and tracking for biological discoveries and translational applications.Npj imaging · 2024Review
- Ensemble Deep Learning Object Detection Fusion for Cell Tracking, Mitosis, and Lineage.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Multi-feature-Based Robust Cell Tracking.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Method for simultaneous tracking of thousands of unlabeled cells within a transparent 3D matrix.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- DMNet: Dual-Stream Marker Guided Deep Network for Dense Cell Segmentation and Lineage Tracking.... IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision workshops. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · 2021Article
- Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation.Nature methods · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Deep Learning Strategies for Nucleus Segmentation in Fluorescence Images.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2019Article
- A novel generic dictionary-based denoising method for improving noisy and densely packed nuclei segmentation in 3D time-lapse fluorescence microscopy images.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A probabilistic approach to joint cell tracking and segmentation in high-throughput microscopy videos.Medical image analysis · 2018Article
- Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Tumstatin regulates the angiogenic and inflammatory potential of airway smooth muscle extracellular matrix.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2017Article
- Quantitative label-free single cell tracking in 3D biomimetic matrices.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Global linking of cell tracks using the Viterbi algorithm.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2015Article
- A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Heterogeneous structure of stem cells dynamics: statistical models and quantitative predictions.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Labour-efficient in vitro lymphocyte population tracking and fate prediction using automation and manual review.PloS one · 2014Article
- Quantitative characterization of cell behaviors through cell cycle progression via automated cell tracking.PloS one · 2014Article
- In vitro myoblast motility models: investigating migration dynamics for the study of skeletal muscle repair.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated microscopy is currently the only method to non-invasively and label-free observe complex multi-cellular processes, such as cell migration, cell cycle, and cell differentiation. Extracting biological information from a time-series of micrographs requires each cell to be recognized and followed through sequential microscopic snapshots. Although recent attempts to automatize this process resulted in ever improving cell detection rates, manual identification of identical cells is still the most reliable technique. However, its tedious and subjective nature prevented tracking from becoming a standardized tool for the investigation of cell cultures. Here, we present a novel method to accomplish automated cell tracking with a reliability comparable to manual tracking. Previously, automated cell tracking could not rival the reliability of manual tracking because, in contrast to the human way of solving this task, none of the algorithms had an independent quality control mechanism; they missed validation. Thus, instead of trying to improve the cell detection or tracking rates, we proceeded from the idea to automatically inspect the tracking results and accept only those of high trustworthiness, while rejecting all other results. This validation algorithm works independently of the quality of cell detection and tracking through a systematic search for tracking errors. It is based only on very general assumptions about the spatiotemporal contiguity of cell paths. While traditional tracking often aims to yield genealogic information about single cells, the natural outcome of a validated cell tracking algorithm turns out to be a set of complete, but often unconnected cell paths, i.e. records of cells from mitosis to mitosis. This is a consequence of the fact that the validation algorithm takes complete paths as the unit of rejection/acceptance. The resulting set of complete paths can be used to automatically extract important biological parameters with high reliability and statistical significance. These include the distribution of life/cycle times and cell areas, as well as of the symmetry of cell divisions and motion analyses. The new algorithm thus allows for the quantification and parameterization of cell culture with unprecedented accuracy. To evaluate our validation algorithm, two large reference data sets were manually created. These data sets comprise more than 320,000 unstained adult pancreatic stem cells from rat, including 2592 mitotic events. The reference data sets specify every cell position and shape, and assign each cell to the correct branch of its genealogic tree. We provide these reference data sets for free use by others as a benchmark for the future improvement of automated tracking methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.