Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22086819›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety.

John W Beasley, Tosha B Wetterneck, Jon Temte, Jamie A Lapin, Paul Smith, A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez, Ben-Tzion Karsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Public health communications and alert fatigue.BMC health services research · 2013
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Precision feedback: A conceptual model.Learning health systems · 2024
    Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John W BeasleyDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Tosha B Wetterneck
Jon Temte
Jamie A Lapin
Paul Smith
A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez
Ben-Tzion Karsh

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Proactive Risk Assessment of Primary Care of the ElderlyP20HS017115 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KARSH, BEN-TZION · 2007 to 2007
$199k
AHRQ HHS 1P20HS017115AHRQ HHS P20 HS017115NCHS CDC HHS 1R18SH017899NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this article is to explore the concept of information chaos as it applies to the issues of patient safety and physician workload in primary care and to propose a research agenda.

methodsWe use a human factors engineering perspective to discuss the concept of information chaos in primary care and explore implications for its impact on physician performance and patient safety.

resultsInformation chaos is comprised of various combinations of information overload, information underload, information scatter, information conflict, and erroneous information. We provide a framework for understanding information chaos, its impact on physician mental workload and situation awareness, and its consequences, and we discuss possible solutions and suggest a research agenda that may lead to methods to reduce the problem.

conclusionsInformation chaos is experienced routinely by primary care physicians. This is not just inconvenient, annoying, and frustrating; it has implications for physician performance and patient safety. Additional research is needed to define methods to measure and eventually reduce information chaos.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInformation ManagementPatient SafetyPhysiciansElectronic Health RecordsErgonomicsHumansPractice Management, MedicalPrimary Health CareWorkload

Identifiers

PMID22086819
PMCPMC3286113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.