ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012
Can ex vivo evaluation (testing) predict the sensitivity of CLL cells to therapy with purine analogs in conjunction with an alkylating agent? A comparison of in vivo and ex vivo responses to treatment.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The rate of in vitro fludarabine-induced peripheral blood and bone marrow cell apoptosis may predict the chemotherapy outcome in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- A combination of cytokines rescues highly purified leukemic CLL B-cells from spontaneous apoptosis in vitro.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malfunctions in the regulation of apoptosis cause the accumulation of malignant, long-lived B CD19+/CD5+ cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The primary goal in CLL therapy is to overcome resistance to apoptosis and efficiently trigger programmed cell death in leukemic cells. This study demonstrated that the in vivo responses of malignant cells from CLL patients after administration of purine analogs (cladribine/fludarabine) with cyclophosphamide vary significantly. For comparative purposes, the sensitivity of leukemic cells obtained from the same CLL patients to conventional purine analogs and the selective CDK inhibitor R-roscovitine (ROSC) was determined, with and without the addition of an alkylating agent, prior to the onset of in vivo therapy. The kinetics and rate of spontaneous and drug-induced apoptosis of CLL cells under ex vivo conditions differed significantly between patients, mirroring the variability observed during in vivo treatment. Interestingly, individual patients' leukemic cells were comparably sensitive to the drugs under both conditions. Of the drugs examined, ROSC exerted the highest therapeutic efficacy under ex vivo conditions. Our results indicate that ex vivo testing might be useful for identifying the most potent first-line therapeutic regimen for specific CLL patients and possibly for the design of therapies tailored for individual CLL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.