Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22086338›Full record

ArticleNature communications2011

Functionalized arrays of Raman-enhancing nanoparticles for capture and culture-free analysis of bacteria in human blood.

Ting-Yu Liu, Kun-Tong Tsai, Huai-Hsien Wang, Yu Chen, Yu-Hsuan Chen, Yuan-Chun Chao, Hsuan-Hao Chang, Chi-Hung Lin, Juen-Kai Wang, Yuh-Lin Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Rapid, Label-Free Prediction of Antibiotic Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Overview of Rapid Detection Methods forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ting-Yu LiuInstitute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kun-Tong Tsai
Huai-Hsien Wang
Yu Chen
Yu-Hsuan Chen
Yuan-Chun Chao
Hsuan-Hao Chang
Chi-Hung Lin
Juen-Kai Wang
Yuh-Lin Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting bacteria in clinical samples without using time-consuming culture processes would allow rapid diagnoses. Such a culture-free detection method requires the capture and analysis of bacteria from a body fluid, which are usually of complicated composition. Here we show that coating Ag-nanoparticle arrays with vancomycin (Van) can provide label-free analysis of bacteria via surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), leading to a ~1,000-fold increase in bacteria capture, without introducing significant spectral interference. Bacteria from human blood can be concentrated onto a microscopic Van-coated area while blood cells are excluded. Furthermore, a Van-coated substrate provides distinctly different SERS spectra of Van-susceptible and Van-resistant Enterococcus, indicating its potential use for drug-resistance tests. Our results represent a critical step towards the creation of SERS-based multifunctional biochips for rapid culture- and label-free detection and drug-resistant testing of microorganisms in clinical samples.

Indexed as

BacteriaBloodEnterococcusEnterococcus faecalisEscherichia coliHumansLactiplantibacillus plantarumMetal NanoparticlesSilverSpectrum Analysis, RamanVancomycinSilverVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22086338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.