Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22086265›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2012

Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence.

Danielle Markle Price, Karen Noblett

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03005977 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

What Test is Most Sensitive in Identifying Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Urodynamics, Standing Cough Stress Test, or Pyridium Pad Test?

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2017 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsStress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ ProlapseArmsUrodynamics
NCT06455150 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Female Badminton Athletes and Sedentary: Protocol of an Observational Case-Control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlcalaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsPelvic Floor DisordersArmsAssessment of pelvic floor dysfunctions' symptoms and sings, pelvic floor muscle strength and quality of life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Standing cough test stratification of moderate male stress urinary incontinence.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle Markle PriceUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ob/Gyn, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Orange, CA 92868, USA. daniellemarkleprice@gmail.com
Karen Noblett
Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe 24-h pad test and cough stress test are commonly used to assess stress urinary incontinence; however, no comparative data are available. The cough stress test is superior to the 24-h pad test.

methodsWomen with predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms underwent a cough stress test, a 24-h pad test, and urodynamic testing.

resultsComplete data were available on 55 women. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the stress test occurred in 89% of women (k = 0.51). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 90%, 80%, 98%, and 44%. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the pad test occurred in 60% of women (k = 0.08). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 60%, 60%, 94%, and 13%. Agreement between the cough stress test and the pad test occurred in 67% (k = 0.26).

conclusionsThe cough stress test is more reliable than the pad test for documentation of stress urinary incontinence.

Indexed as

CoughIncontinence PadsAgedExercise TestFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUrinary Incontinence, StressUrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID22086265
OpenAlexW2006330510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.