ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2012
Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the Future of Aesthetic Surgery: An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Global Publication Forecasting.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Observational
- Early emergency department decision support for heart failure hospitalization using triage-level unstructured and structured data: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A Sentence Classification-Based Medical Status Extraction Pipeline for Electronic Health Records: Institutional Case Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Large language models in clinical trials: applications, technical advances, and future directions.BMC medicine · 2025Review
- Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Review
- Combining unsupervised, supervised and rule-based learning: the case of detecting patient allergies in electronic health records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Machine learning-driven clinical decision support system for concept-based searching: a field trial in a Norwegian hospital.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- A Deep Language Model for Symptom Extraction From Clinical Text and its Application to Extract COVID-19 Symptoms From Social Media.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2022Article
- Feature extraction for phenotyping from semantic and knowledge resources.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
- Classifying relations in clinical narratives using segment graph convolutional and recurrent neural networks (Seg-GCRNs).Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Combine Factual Medical Knowledge and Distributed Word Representation to Improve Clinical Named Entity Recognition.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Segment convolutional neural networks (Seg-CNNs) for classifying relations in clinical notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Counting trees in Random Forests: Predicting symptom severity in psychiatric intake reports.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Recurrent neural networks for classifying relations in clinical notes.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Enhanced Quality Measurement Event Detection: An Application to Physician Reporting.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2017Article
- Expansion of medical vocabularies using distributional semantics on Japanese patient blogs.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016Article
- Ensembles of randomized trees using diverse distributed representations of clinical events.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Article
- Speculation detection for Chinese clinical notes: Impacts of word segmentation and embedding models.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2016Article
- Using local lexicalized rules to identify heart disease risk factors in clinical notes.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- Identifying named entities from PubMed for enriching semantic categories.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracting concepts (such as drugs, symptoms, and diagnoses) from clinical narratives constitutes a basic enabling technology to unlock the knowledge within and support more advanced reasoning applications such as diagnosis explanation, disease progression modeling, and intelligent analysis of the effectiveness of treatment. The recent release of annotated training sets of de-identified clinical narratives has contributed to the development and refinement of concept extraction methods. However, as the annotation process is labor-intensive, training data are necessarily limited in the concepts and concept patterns covered, which impacts the performance of supervised machine learning applications trained with these data. This paper proposes an approach to minimize this limitation by combining supervised machine learning with empirical learning of semantic relatedness from the distribution of the relevant words in additional unannotated text. The approach uses a sequential discriminative classifier (Conditional Random Fields) to extract the mentions of medical problems, treatments and tests from clinical narratives. It takes advantage of all Medline abstracts indexed as being of the publication type "clinical trials" to estimate the relatedness between words in the i2b2/VA training and testing corpora. In addition to the traditional features such as dictionary matching, pattern matching and part-of-speech tags, we also used as a feature words that appear in similar contexts to the word in question (that is, words that have a similar vector representation measured with the commonly used cosine metric, where vector representations are derived using methods of distributional semantics). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort exploring the use of distributional semantics, the semantics derived empirically from unannotated text often using vector space models, for a sequence classification task such as concept extraction. Therefore, we first experimented with different sliding window models and found the model with parameters that led to best performance in a preliminary sequence labeling task. The evaluation of this approach, performed against the i2b2/VA concept extraction corpus, showed that incorporating features based on the distribution of words across a large unannotated corpus significantly aids concept extraction. Compared to a supervised-only approach as a baseline, the micro-averaged F-score for exact match increased from 80.3% to 82.3% and the micro-averaged F-score based on inexact match increased from 89.7% to 91.3%. These improvements are highly significant according to the bootstrap resampling method and also considering the performance of other systems. Thus, distributional semantic features significantly improve the performance of concept extraction from clinical narratives by taking advantage of word distribution information obtained from unannotated data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.