ReviewCancer metastasis reviews1990
The current state of oncogenes and cancer: experimental approaches for analyzing oncogenetic events in human cancer.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein deubiquitylase USP3 stabilizes Aurora A to promote proliferation and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Antibody Therapeutics in Oncology.Immunotherapy (Los Angeles, Calif.) · 2016Article
- -148 C/T polymorphism of Axin2 contributes to a decreased risk of cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2015Article
- Review
- Prognostic significance of the expression of c-fos, c-jun and c-erbB-1 oncogene products in human squamous cell lung carcinomas.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The development of cancer is a multistage process. The activation of proto-oncogenes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes play a critical role in the induction of tumors. Using human cell model systems of carcinogenesis, we have studied how oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and recessive cancer susceptibility genes participate in this multistep process. Normal human cells are resistant to the transforming potential of oncogenes, such as ras oncogenes, which are activated by specific point mutations. Since as many as 40% of some tumor types contain activated ras oncogenes, a preneoplastic transition in multistage carcinogenesis must involve changing from an oncogene-resistant stage to an oncogene-susceptible stage. The analysis of such critical steps in carcinogenesis using rodent systems has usually not represented the human disease with fidelity. In order to study this carcinogenic process, we have developed human cell, in vitro systems that represent some of the genetic changes that occur in cellular genes during human carcinogenesis. Using these systems, we have learned some of the functions of dominant activated-transforming oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and cellular immortalization genes and how they influence the carcinogenic process in human cells. Using our understanding of these processes, we are attempting to clone critical genes involved in the etiology of familial cancers. These investigations may help us to develop procedures that allow us to predict, in these cancer families, which individuals are at high risk for developing cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.