Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22085384›Full record

ReviewDrugs2011

Adjuvant therapy for early colon cancer: current status.

Alexander Stein, Sonja Hiemer, Hans-Joachim Schmoll

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. From Evidence-based Medicine to Personalized Medicine.Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology · 2012
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander SteinUniversity Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. a.stein@uke.de
Sonja Hiemer
Hans-Joachim Schmoll
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumour reduces the risk of death by an absolute 5% in UICC (Union Internationale Contre le Cancer) stage II colon cancer and about 15-20% in stage III. Adjuvant treatment has to be evaluated separately for each stage due to the different clinical situations: in stage II about 80% of patients are cured by surgery alone, whereas only about half of patients with stage III are cured by surgery. Decisions on adjuvant treatment need to be discussed with the patient on an individual basis, and take into account patient characteristics (performance status, age, co-morbidity and patient preference) as well as cancer features (pathological stage, grading and overall risk of relapse). Recently, capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin has been approved for treatment of stage III colon cancer, providing the benefits of an oral fluoropyrimidine. Predictive markers for guidance of treatment have gained importance, particularly in stage II disease. Microsatellite instability, a well known prognostic factor, might be predictive for a lack of activity of fluorouracil treatment in some stage II patients. Furthermore, patients aged ≥70 years do not seem to obtain the same benefit from combination therapy compared with those aged <70 years. The impact of these current developments on daily clinical practice is discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials as TopicColonic NeoplasmsHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22085384
OpenAlexW1980824358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.