Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22085215›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2012

Social and psychological determinants of levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: posters, lurkers, and nonusers.

Jeong Yeob Han, Jung-Hyun Kim, Hye Jin Yoon, Minsun Shim, Fiona M McTavish, David H Gustafson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Engagement with a social networking intervention for cancer-related distress.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2015
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The implementation of web-based cognitive rehabilitation in adult cancer survivors: examining participant engagement, attrition and treatment fidelity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  18. Social media for breast cancer survivors: a literature review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jeong Yeob HanDepartment of Telecommunications, Henry W. Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, and Center for Health and Risk Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA. jeonghan@uga.edu
Jung-Hyun Kim
Hye Jin Yoon
Minsun Shim
Fiona M McTavish
David H Gustafson
Grady Memorial Hospital · USKent State University · USSouthern Methodist University · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Using Technology to Enhance Cancer Communication and Improve Clinical OutcomesP50CA095817 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2003 to 2012
$19.3M
NCI NIH HHS N02-CO-01040-75NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the benefits and growing availability of online cancer support groups, many breast cancer patients still do not actively participate in them. To better understand cancer patients' online information- and support-seeking behaviors, this study explores how various social and psychological characteristics predict different levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: posters, lurkers, and nonusers. The study sample included 231 recently diagnosed breast cancer patients. Data included baseline survey scores of demographic, disease-related, and psychosocial factors and automatically collected discussion group use data over the 4-month intervention. Patterns of engagement with the cancer support group differed according to the patients' characteristics, suggesting that (a) cancer patients have very different orientations to and engagement with an online support group, and (b) deficits in social and psychological resources may not be barriers to participation in a cancer support group, but rather motivators to interact with other patients. The authors discuss the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorSocial SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBreast NeoplasmsEducational StatusFemaleHumansInternetMiddle AgedSelf-Help Groups

Identifiers

PMID22085215
PMCPMC3556823
OpenAlexW2159782114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.