Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22084458›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2011

Update on acute otitis media in children younger than 2 years of age.

Colin J McWilliams, Ran D Goldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotic therapy for children with acute otitis media.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Review
  4. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin J McWilliamsPediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) program, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Ran D Goldman
BC Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionAs concern about antimicrobial resistance grows, I am aware of the need to reduce unnecessary antibiotic treatment; however, in my practice I see many children with acute otitis media (AOM) and this is the most common reason I prescribe antibiotics. Most of these children are young and otherwise healthy, and I am uncertain about when to prescribe antibiotics and when to endorse "watchful waiting." Which children will benefit from antibiotic treatment? ANSWER: Current Canadian guidelines recommend all children younger than 2 years of age with otalgia due to AOM and fever greater than 39°C be considered for treatment with amoxicillin. Watchful waiting is indicated only for children older than 6 months with mild-to-moderate AOM. Recent evidence suggests young children with a definitive diagnosis of AOM will benefit from antibiotics and experience fewer treatment failures compared with placebo, regardless of the severity of otitis. These studies do not challenge watchful waiting directly, and determining which children will improve spontaneously remains an enigma.

Indexed as

Watchful WaitingAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCanadaFeverHumansInfantOtitis MediaPractice Guidelines as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID22084458
PMCPMC3215605
OpenAlexW2155731167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.