Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22084415›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2011

Cl(-) concentration changes and desensitization of GABA(A) and glycine receptors.

Urban Karlsson, Michael Druzin, Staffan Johansson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Direct energy consumption by inhibitory GABAFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Massive Activation of GABABiomolecules · 2025
    Review
  3. Optogenetic Determination of Dynamic and Cell-Type-Specific Inhibitory Reversal Potentials.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Physiological Role of ATPase for GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intricacies of GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of intracellular linkers in gating and desensitization of human pentameric ligand-gated ion channels.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  19. α1F64 Residue at GABA(A) receptor binding site is involved in gating by influencing the receptor flipping transitions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Urban KarlssonDepartment of Neurosciences, CNSP iMed, AstraZeneca Research and Development, S-151 85 Södertälje, Sweden.
Michael Druzin
Staffan Johansson
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Desensitization of ligand-gated ion channels plays a critical role for the information transfer between neurons. The current view on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) and glycine receptors includes significant rapid components of desensitization as well as cross-desensitization between the two receptor types. Here, we analyze the mechanism of apparent cross-desensitization between native GABA(A) and glycine receptors in rat central neurons and quantify to what extent the current decay in the presence of ligand is a result of desensitization versus changes in intracellular Cl(-) concentration ([Cl(-)](i)). We show that apparent cross-desensitization of currents evoked by GABA and by glycine is caused by changes in [Cl(-)](i). We also show that changes in [Cl(-)](i) are critical for the decay of current in the presence of either GABA or glycine, whereas changes in conductance often play a minor role only. Thus, the currents decayed significantly quicker than the conductances, which decayed with time constants of several seconds and in some cells did not decay below the value at peak current during 20-s agonist application. By taking the cytosolic volume into account and numerically computing the membrane currents and expected changes in [Cl(-)](i), we provide a theoretical framework for the observed effects. Modeling diffusional exchange of Cl(-) between cytosol and patch pipettes, we also show that considerable changes in [Cl(-)](i) may be expected and cause rapidly decaying current components in conventional whole cell or outside-out patch recordings. The findings imply that a reevaluation of the desensitization properties of GABA(A) and glycine receptors is needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsChloridesCytosolgamma-Aminobutyric AcidMaleMembrane PotentialsNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, GlycineChloridesgamma-Aminobutyric AcidReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Glycine

Identifiers

PMID22084415
PMCPMC3226965
OpenAlexW2114214383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.