Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22083600›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2012

Lobule-specific membrane excitability of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Chang-Hee Kim, Seung-Ha Oh, Jun Ho Lee, Sun O Chang, Jun Kim, Sang Jeong Kim

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heterogeneity in Slow Synaptic Transmission Diversifies Purkinje Cell Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Purkinje cell models: past, present and future.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. BK Channel Regulation of Afterpotentials and Burst Firing in Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chang-Hee KimDepartment of Physiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Chongro-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
Seung-Ha Oh
Jun Ho Lee
Sun O Chang
Jun Kim
Sang Jeong Kim
New Generation University College · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) are the sole output of the cerebellar cortex and function as key to a variety of learning-related behaviours by integrating multimodal afferent inputs. Intrinsic membrane excitability of neurons determines the input-output relationship, and therefore governs the functions of neural circuits. Cerebellar vermis consists of ten lobules (lobules I-X), and each lobule receives different sensory information. However, lobule-specific differences of electrophysiological properties of PC are incompletely understood. To address this question, we performed a systematic comparison of membrane properties of PCs from different lobules (lobules III-V vs. X). Two types of firing patterns (tonic firing and complex bursting) were identified in response to depolarizing current injections in lobule III-V PCs, whereas four distinct firing patterns (tonic firing, complex bursting, initial bursting and gap firing) were observed in lobule X. A-type K(+) current and early inactivation of fast Na(+) conductance with activation of 4-aminopyridine-sensitive conductances were shown to be responsible for the formation of gap firing and initial bursting patterns, respectively, which were observed only in lobule X. In response to current injection, PCs in lobule X spiked with wider dynamic range. These differences in firing pattern and membrane properties probably contribute to signal processing of afferent inputs in lobule-specific fashion, and particularly diversity of discharge patterns in lobule X, as a part of the vestibulocerebellum, might be involved in strict coordination of a precise temporal response to a wide range of head movements.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCell MembraneCerebral CortexElectric StimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaMembrane PotentialsModels, AnimalNeurons, AfferentPatch-Clamp TechniquesPurkinje CellsRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID22083600
PMCPMC3285064
OpenAlexW2172004022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.