Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22083421›Full record

SynthesisLung2012

Occupational exposure influences on gender differences in respiratory health.

Helen Dimich-Ward, Kris Beking, Anne DyBuncio, Moira Chan-Yeung, Weiwei Du, Barbara Karlen, Pat G Camp, Susan M Kennedy

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lung, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex and gender differences during the lung lifespan: unveiling a pivotal impact.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Career Advice for Young Allergy Patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gender differences in work-related asthma: surveillance data from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey, 1993-2008.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helen Dimich-WardRespiratory Division, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Helen.Ward@vch.ca
Kris Beking
Anne DyBuncio
Moira Chan-Yeung
Weiwei Du
Barbara Karlen
Pat G Camp
Susan M Kennedy
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate gender differences in the respiratory health of workers exposed to organic and inorganic dusts.

methodsMeta-analysis techniques incorporating logistic regression were applied to a combined file of 12 occupational health studies.

resultsMeta-analysis of data on 1,367 women and 4,240 men showed that women had higher odds of shortness of breath whether exposed to inorganic dust or having no occupational exposure, with an overall odds ratio (OR) of 2.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.57-2.73) adjusted for smoking status, age, body mass index (BMI), ethnic status, atopy, and job duration. Inorganic dust exposure was associated with the highest odds of asthma (adjusted OR = 8.38, 95% CI = 1.72-40.89) for women compared to men, but no differences were found for unexposed workers. With organic dust exposure, men had elevated odds for occasional wheeze and worse lung function compared to women.

conclusionWithin the limitations of this analysis, gender differences in respiratory health, as suggested by population-based studies, were confirmed in our analysis of occupational health studies, with the general type of exposure, organic or inorganic, generally determining the extent of differences. The higher risks for women compared to men for shortness of breath were robust regardless of work exposure category, with the highest odds ratios found for asthma.

Indexed as

DustAdultAgricultureAsthmaConfidence IntervalsConstruction IndustryDyspneaFemaleFood IndustryForced Expiratory VolumeHealth Care SectorHumansMaleMetallurgyMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesDust

Identifiers

PMID22083421
OpenAlexW2027051653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.