ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2012
Executive summary of the report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry on general and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ketamine/esketamine treatment for resistant depression in children and adolescents: a PRISMA systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Are People Worse Off in a Mental Health Treatment Paradigm Where Medication Is Deemphasised? A Naturalistic Noninferiority Trial of an Initiative to Improve Patient Choice.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2026Article
- Vortioxetine as a potential alternative for patients with escitalopram-induced jitteriness/anxiety syndrome: A report of three cases.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023Article
- Differences in Cerebral Distribution between Imipramine and Paroxetine via Membrane Transporters at the Rat Blood-Brain Barrier.Pharmaceutical research · 2022Article
- A multivariate approach linking reported side effects of clinical antidepressant and antipsychotic trials to in vitro binding affinities.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014Article
- Depression and anxiety in Swedish primary health care: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2014Article
- Population impact of depression on functional disability in elderly: results from "São Paulo Ageing & Health Study" (SPAH).European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2013Article
- On the application of light therapy in German-speaking countries.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2012Article
- Comparison of health-related quality of life among patients using atypical antipsychotics for treatment of depression: results from the National Health and Wellness Survey.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2012Article
- Emotional status: diagnosis and treatment for severe psychiatric disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current gold standard in the treatment of depression includes pharmacotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic strategies together with social support. Due to the actually discussed controversies concerning the differential efficacy of antidepressants, a contribution to a comprehensive clarification seems to be necessary to avert further deterioration and uncertainty from patients, relatives, and their treating psychiatrists and general practitioners. Both efficacy and clinical effectiveness of antidepressants in the treatment of depressive disorders can be confirmed. Clinically meaningful antidepressant treatment effects were confirmed in different types of studies. Methodological issues of randomized controlled studies, meta-analyses, and effectiveness studies will be discussed. Furthermore, actual data about the differential efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants with distinct pharmacodynamic properties and about outcome differences in studies using antidepressants and/or psychotherapy are discussed. This is followed by a clinically oriented depiction-the differential clinical effectiveness of different pharmacodynamic modes of action of antidepressants in different subtypes of depressive disorders. It can be summarized that the spectrum of different antidepressant treatments has broadened during the last decades. The efficacy and clinical effectiveness of antidepressants is statistically significant and clinically relevant and proven repeatedly. For further optimizing antidepressant treatment plans, clearly structured treatment algorithms and the implementation of psychotherapy seem to be useful. A modern individualized antidepressant treatment in most cases is a well-tolerated and efficacious tool to minimize the negative impact of the otherwise devastating and life-threatening outcome of depressive disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22083391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.