Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22083391›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2012

Executive summary of the report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry on general and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders.

Thomas C Baghai, Pierre Blier, David S Baldwin, Michael Bauer, Guy M Goodwin, Kostas N Fountoulakis, Siegfried Kasper, Brian E Leonard, Ulrik F Malt, Dan J Stein and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A multivariate approach linking reported side effects of clinical antidepressant and antipsychotic trials to in vitro binding affinities.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
  6. Depression and anxiety in Swedish primary health care: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. On the application of light therapy in German-speaking countries.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Emotional status: diagnosis and treatment for severe psychiatric disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Thomas C BaghaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany. Thomas.Baghai@medbo.de
Pierre Blier
David S Baldwin
Michael Bauer
Guy M Goodwin
Kostas N Fountoulakis
Siegfried Kasper
Brian E Leonard
Ulrik F Malt
Dan J Stein
Marcio Versiani
Hans-Jürgen Möller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current gold standard in the treatment of depression includes pharmacotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic strategies together with social support. Due to the actually discussed controversies concerning the differential efficacy of antidepressants, a contribution to a comprehensive clarification seems to be necessary to avert further deterioration and uncertainty from patients, relatives, and their treating psychiatrists and general practitioners. Both efficacy and clinical effectiveness of antidepressants in the treatment of depressive disorders can be confirmed. Clinically meaningful antidepressant treatment effects were confirmed in different types of studies. Methodological issues of randomized controlled studies, meta-analyses, and effectiveness studies will be discussed. Furthermore, actual data about the differential efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants with distinct pharmacodynamic properties and about outcome differences in studies using antidepressants and/or psychotherapy are discussed. This is followed by a clinically oriented depiction-the differential clinical effectiveness of different pharmacodynamic modes of action of antidepressants in different subtypes of depressive disorders. It can be summarized that the spectrum of different antidepressant treatments has broadened during the last decades. The efficacy and clinical effectiveness of antidepressants is statistically significant and clinically relevant and proven repeatedly. For further optimizing antidepressant treatment plans, clearly structured treatment algorithms and the implementation of psychotherapy seem to be useful. A modern individualized antidepressant treatment in most cases is a well-tolerated and efficacious tool to minimize the negative impact of the otherwise devastating and life-threatening outcome of depressive disorders.

Indexed as

PsychotherapyAntidepressive AgentsDatabases, BibliographicDepressive DisorderHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.