Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22083336›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2012

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided endoscopic necrosectomy of the pancreas: is irrigation necessary?

Christian Jürgensen, Frank Neser, Joachim Boese-Landgraf, Detlef Schuppan, Ulrich Stölzel, Annette Fritscher-Ravens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Endotherapy for pancreatic necrosis: An update.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Endoscopic necrosectomy under fluoroscopic guidance - a single center experience.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2015
    Article
  8. Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventional procedures.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian JürgensenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Charité University Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. Christian.Juergensen@charite.de
Frank Neser
Joachim Boese-Landgraf
Detlef Schuppan
Ulrich Stölzel
Annette Fritscher-Ravens
Klinikum Chemnitz · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFindings have shown endoscopic necrosectomy to be beneficial for patients with symptomatic pancreatic necrosis accessible for an endoscopic approach. The available studies show that endoscopic necrosectomy requires a multitude of subsequent procedures including repeat irrigation for removal of the necrotic material. This study aimed to investigate the need for additional irrigation in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis treated by endoscopic necrosectomy.

methodsThe study enrolled 35 consecutive patients (27 men) with a median age of 59 years who had pancreatic necrosis treated with endoscopic necrosectomy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided internal drainage and consecutive endoscopic necrosectomy was combined with interval multistenting of the cavity. Neither endoscopic nor external irrigation was part of the procedure.

resultsAn average of 6.2 endoscopy sessions per patient were needed for access, necrosectomy, and stent management. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6% (2/35), including one procedure-related death resulting from postinterventional aspiration. The immediate morbidity rate was 9% (3/35). It was possible to achieve clinical remission for all the surviving patients with no additional surgery needed for management of the necroses. The median follow-up period was 23 months.

conclusionNeither endoscopic nor external flushing is needed for successful endoscopic treatment of symptomatic necroses. Even without irrigation, the outcome for patients treated with endoscopic necrosectomy is comparable to that described in the published data.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEndosonographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisPancreasPancreatitisStentsTherapeutic Irrigation

Identifiers

PMID22083336
OpenAlexW2073982053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.