Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22083298›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2012

The effect of device-based cardiac contractility modulation therapy on myocardial efficiency and oxidative metabolism in patients with heart failure.

Georg Goliasch, Aliasghar Khorsand, Matthias Schütz, Georgios Karanikas, Cesar Khazen, Heinz Sochor, Herwig Schmidinger, Michael Wolzt, Senta Graf

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Device Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. [Cardiac contractility modulation for treatment of chronic heart failure].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cardiac Contractility Modulation for Heart Failure: Current and Future Directions.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georg GoliaschDepartment of Cardiology, Vienna General Hospital/Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. georg.goliasch@meduniwien.ac.at
Aliasghar Khorsand
Matthias Schütz
Georgios Karanikas
Cesar Khazen
Heinz Sochor
Herwig Schmidinger
Michael Wolzt
Senta Graf
Medical University of Vienna · ATVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a device-based therapy that involves delivery of nonexcitatory electrical signals resulting in improved ventricular function and a reversal of maladaptive cardiac fetal gene programmes. Our aim was to evaluate whether acute application of CCM leads to an increase in myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO(2)) in patients with chronic heart failure using (11)C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET).

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 21 patients with severe heart failure. (11)C-acetate PET was performed before and after activation of the CCM device. In 12 patients an additional stress study with dobutamine was performed.

resultsUnder resting conditions, the values of myocardial blood flow (MBF), MVO(2) and work metabolic index (WMI, reflecting myocardial efficiency) with the CCM device activated did not differ significantly from the values with the device deactivated. MBF was 0.81 ± 0.18 ml min(-1) g(-1) with the device off and 0.80 ± 0.15 ml min(-1) g(-1) with the device on (p = 0.818), MVO(2) was 6.81 ± 1.69 ml/min/100 g with the device off and 7.15 ± 1.62 ml/min/100 g with the device on (p = 0.241) and WMI was 4.94 ± 1.14 mmHg ml/m(2) with the device off and 5.21 ± 1.36 mmHg ml/m(2) with the device on (p = 0.344). Under dobutamine stress, the values of MBF, MVO(2) and WMI with the CCM device activated did not differ from the values with the device deactivated, but were significantly increased compared with the values obtained under resting conditions.

conclusionThese results indicate that CCM does not induce increased MVO(2), even under stress conditions.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesMyocardial ContractionAcetatesAgedCarbon RadioisotopesEnergy MetabolismFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumOxidation-ReductionOxygenPositron-Emission TomographyTime FactorsAcetatesCarbon RadioisotopesOxygen

Identifiers

PMID22083298
OpenAlexW2044815098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.