Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22083099›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2011

[Complications of peripheral regional anesthesia].

M Neuburger, J Büttner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Infiltration anesthesia].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2020
    Review
  6. [Oberst's block anesthesia].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M NeuburgerAbteilung für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Ortenau Klinikum, Josef-Wurzler-Strasse 7, Achern, Germany. michaelneuburger@aol.com
J Büttner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral regional anesthesia is a commonly used and safe procedure and eneral complications or side effects are generally rare. Nerve damage has an incidence <0.1% depending on the definition and the prognosis is good. To avoid bleeding complications the national standards of block performance under antithrombotic therapy should be respected. Intoxication is mainly the result of accidental intravenous administration and is difficult to treat but higher doses of intravenous lipid emulsions can improve the outcome. Potential infectious complications can occur mainly as a result of catheter techniques and require a strict aseptic approach. Further rare complications are allergies, dislocation of catheters and knotting or loops in catheters. Besides the general complications, there are some specific complications depending on the puncture site, such as pneumothorax or renal puncture.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthetics, LocalBrachial PlexusCatheterizationCathetersCross InfectionDrug HypersensitivityEquipment FailureFat Emulsions, IntravenousHematomaHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLumbosacral PlexusMedical ErrorsNerve BlockRisk FactorsAnesthetics, LocalFat Emulsions, Intravenous

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.