Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22082955›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2012

Development and validation of educational materials for food allergy.

Scott H Sicherer, Perla A Vargas, Marion E Groetch, Lynn Christie, Suzanne K Carlisle, Sally Noone, Stacie M Jones

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Consortium for Food Allergy Research (CoFAR): The first generation.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Long-term effectiveness of online anaphylaxis education for pharmacists.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2014
    Article
  16. International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2014
    Article
  17. Addressing food allergy issues within child care centers.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scott H SichererElliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. scott.sicherer@mssm.edu
Perla A Vargas
Marion E Groetch
Lynn Christie
Suzanne K Carlisle
Sally Noone
Stacie M Jones

Funding

Mechanistic CoreU19AI066738 · NIAID · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI SICHERER, SCOTT H · 2005 to 2016
$43.6M
Food Allergy Research Consortium and Statistical CenterU01AI066560 · NIAID · THE EMMES COMPANY, LLC · PI DAWSON, PETER RUSSELL, LINDBLAD, ROBERT · 2005 to 2016
$12.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI066560NIAID NIH HHS U01AI066560NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI066738NIAID NIH HHS U19AI066738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a food allergy educational program. STUDY

designMaterials developed through focus groups and parental and expert review were submitted to 60 parents of newly referred children with a prior food allergy diagnosis and an epinephrine autoinjector. The main outcome was correct demonstration of an autoinjector.

resultsThe correct number of autoinjector activation steps increased from 3.4 to 5.95 (of 6) after training (P < .001) and was 5.47 at 1 year (P < .05). The mean score for comfort with using the autoinjector (7-point Likert scale) before the curriculum was 4.63 (somewhat comfortable) and increased to 6.23 after the intervention (P < .05) and remained elevated at 1 year (6.03). Knowledge tests (maximum 15) increased from a mean score of 9.2 to 12.4 (P < .001) at the initial visit and remained at 12.7 at 1 year. The annualized rate of allergic reactions fell from 1.77 (historical) the year prior, to 0.42 (P < .001) after the program. On a 7-point Likert scale, all satisfaction categories remained above a favorable mean score of 6: straight-forward, organized, interesting, relevant, and recommend to others.

conclusionsThis food allergy educational curriculum for parents, now available online at no cost, showed high levels of satisfaction and efficacy.

Indexed as

FamilyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEpinephrineFood HypersensitivityHumansInfantPatient Education as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID22082955
PMCPMC3307837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.