Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22082506›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2012

Nucleoli: composition, function, and dynamics.

Peter Shaw, John Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Non-Specific Phytohormone Regulatory Network inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Enzyme-Responsive DNA Condensates.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Modeling the 3D genome of plants.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter ShawDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Center, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom. peter.shaw@jic.ac.uk
John Brown

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/00000128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell NucleolusChromatinDNA DamageDNA, RibosomalEpigenesis, GeneticPlant CellsPlant ProteinsRNAChromatinDNA, RibosomalPlant ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID22082506
PMCPMC3252080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.