Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22082486›Full record

ReviewCurrent molecular medicine2012

Basal breast cancer: a complex and deadly molecular subtype.

F Bertucci, P Finetti, D Birnbaum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current molecular medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Exploring the oncogenic impact of heteroplasmicMitochondrial communications · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cytotoxic Effects ofAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F BertucciDépartement d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, UMR891 Inserm, Marseille, France. bertuccif@marseille.fnclcc.fr
P Finetti
D Birnbaum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decade, gene expression profiling of breast cancer has revealed the existence of five molecular subtypes and allowed the establishment of a new classification. The basal subtype, which represents 15-25% of cases, is characterized by an expression profile similar to that of myoepithelial normal mammary cells. Basal tumors are frequently assimilated to triple-negative (TN) breast cancers. They display epidemiological and clinico-pathological features distinct from other subtypes. Their pattern of relapse is characterized by frequent and early relapses and visceral locations. Despite a relative sensitivity to chemotherapy, the prognosis is poor. Recent characterization of their molecular features, such as the dysfunction of the BRCA1 pathway or the frequent expression of EGFR, provides opportunities for optimizing the systemic treatment. Several clinical trials dedicated to basal or TN tumors are testing cytotoxic agents and/or molecularly targeted therapies. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge of this aggressive and hard-to-treat subtype of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMutationNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasms, Basal CellPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22082486
PMCPMC3343384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.