Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22082432›Full record

Trial reportJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2011

The efficacy of acupressure at the Sanyinjiao point in the improvement of women's general health.

Farzaneh Kashefi, Marjan Khajehei, Ali Reza Ashraf, Peyman Jafari

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Analysis and Thoughts about the Negative Results of International Clinical Trials on Acupuncture.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farzaneh KashefiDepartment of Midwifery, Northern Khorasan University of Medical Science, Bojnoord, Iran. kashefif85@gmail.com
Marjan Khajehei
Ali Reza Ashraf
Peyman Jafari

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study's objective was to examine the effectiveness of Sanyinjiao point (SP6) acupressure on women's general health.

designThis was a randomized, single-blind clinical trial.

settingThe setting for this trial was at Medical University, Bojnoord University of Medical Science, Bojnoord, Iran. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighty-six (86) university students were recruited for this study. Their demographic characteristics were gathered before the intervention commenced. Participants completed General Health Questionnaires (GHQ) prior to participation. Next, they were randomly assigned to either the acupressure-receiving group or the sham-pressure-receiving group. The study group received acupressure at the Sanyinjiao point, while the control group received sham pressure. OUTCOME MEASURES: Both groups completed GHQ after both the first and second months of intervention. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 13.5 for Windows.

resultsThe mean age of those who completed the study was 20.84±1.64 years. Mean scores of GHQs were similar between groups before intervention (p>0.05). The general health of participants in both groups improved after intervention, and the amelioration in four domains was significant in the groups (p<0.05 within group). It was found that acupressure was more effective than sham pressure. In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the four domains of their general heath after the first month of the intervention (p<0.0001). Furthermore, the general health status of the participants changed much more after the second month in both the acupressure intervention and the sham pressure groups; nevertheless, acupressure was more effective than sham pressure (p<0.05).

conclusionsBoth acupressure and sham pressure were effective in promoting women's general health; nevertheless, the efficacy of acupressure was more than that of sham pressure. SP6 acupressure could be regarded as a self-manageable approach to improve women's general health.

Indexed as

AcupressureAcupuncture PointsHealth StatusWomen's HealthAdultFemaleHumansIranSingle-Blind MethodStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22082432
PMCPMC3239320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.