Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22082330›Full record

ReviewCurrent clinical pharmacology2012

Bacterial vaginosis, Atopobium vaginae and nifuratel.

Franco Polatti

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial Load ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nifuratel reducesMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antibiotic resistance genes in the Actinobacteria phylum.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Human Microbiome during Bacterial Vaginosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
  18. Maternal Microbiome and Pregnancy Outcomes That Impact Infant Health: A Review.Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses · 2015
    Review
  19. Probiotics and pregnancy.Current diabetes reports · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Franco PolattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. polattif@libero.it

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a potential cause of obstetric complications and gynecological disorders, there is substantial interest in establishing the most effective treatment. Standard treatment - metronidazole or clindamycin, by either vaginal or oral route � is followed by relapses in about 30% of cases, within a month from treatment completion. This inability to prevent recurrences reflects our lack of knowledge on the origins of BV. Atopobium vaginae has been recently reported to be associated with BV in around 80% of the cases and might be involved in the therapeutic failures. This review looks at the potential benefits of nifuratel against A. vaginae compared to the standard treatments with metronidazole and clindamycin. In vitro, nifuratel is able to inhibit the growth of A. vaginae, with a MIC range of 0.125-1 μg/mL; it is active against G. vaginalis and does not affect lactobacilli. Metronidazole is active against A. vaginae only at very high concentrations (8-256 μg/mL); it is partially active against G. vaginalis and also has no effect on lactobacilli. Clindamycin acts against A. vaginae with an MIC lower than 0.125 μg/mL and is active on G. vaginalis but it also affects lactobacilli, altering the vaginal environment. These observations suggest that nifuratel is probably the most valid therapeutic agent for BV treatment.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGardnerella vaginalisHumansMetronidazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNifuratelSecondary PreventionVaginosis, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinMetronidazoleNifuratel

Identifiers

PMID22082330
PMCPMC3362959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.