Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011
A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00826774 (Practice-based Opportunities for Weight Reduction Trial at University of Pennsylvania), which is not on this map. Cited by 253 papers, 25 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Practice-based Opportunities for Weight Reduction Trial at University of Pennsylvania
Who cites it
253 citing papers in PubMed, 25 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 502 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying the effective behaviour change techniques in nutrition and physical activity interventions for the treatment of overweight/obesity in post-treatment breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Pooled it
- A closer look at weight loss interventions in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of inequalities in the uptake of, adherence to, and effectiveness of behavioral weight management interventions in adults.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022Pooled it
- Does weight management research for adults with severe obesity represent them? Analysis of systematic review data.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- The effects of bariatric surgery on periconception maternal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction update · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- [Is the individual motivational interviewing effective in overweight and obesity treatment? A systematic review].Atencion primaria · 2019Pooled it
- The effects of curcumin on the metabolic parameters of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hepatology international · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of Weight-Loss Medications on Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Obesity in the Workplace: Impact, Outcomes, and Recommendations.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2018Guideline
- Effects of weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effect of lifestyle interventions on glucose regulation among adults without impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2017Pooled it
- Association of Pharmacological Treatments for Obesity With Weight Loss and Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA · 2016 · on this mapPooled it
- Weight change among people randomized to minimal intervention control groups in weight loss trials.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2016Pooled it
- Effect Sizes and Primary Outcomes in Large-Budget, Cardiovascular-Related Behavioral Randomized Controlled Trials Funded by NIH Since 1980.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2016Pooled it
- The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.BMC medical research methodology · 2015Pooled it
- Effectiveness of behavioural weight loss interventions delivered in a primary care setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Family practice · 2014Pooled it
193 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCalls for primary care providers (PCPs) to offer obese patients behavioral weight-loss counseling have not been accompanied by adequate guidance on how such care could be delivered. This randomized trial compared weight loss during a 2-year period in response to three lifestyle interventions, all delivered by PCPs in collaboration with auxiliary health professionals (lifestyle coaches) in their practices.
methodsWe randomly assigned 390 obese adults in six primary care practices to one of three types of intervention: usual care, consisting of quarterly PCP visits that included education about weight management; brief lifestyle counseling, consisting of quarterly PCP visits combined with brief monthly sessions with lifestyle coaches who instructed participants about behavioral weight control; or enhanced brief lifestyle counseling, which provided the same care as described for the previous intervention but included meal replacements or weight-loss medication (orlistat or sibutramine), chosen by the participants in consultation with the PCPs, to potentially increase weight loss.
resultsOf the 390 participants, 86% completed the 2-year trial, at which time, the mean (±SE) weight loss with usual care, brief lifestyle counseling, and enhanced brief lifestyle counseling was 1.7±0.7, 2.9±0.7, and 4.6±0.7 kg, respectively. Initial weight decreased at least 5% in 21.5%, 26.0%, and 34.9% of the participants in the three groups, respectively. Enhanced lifestyle counseling was superior to usual care on both these measures of success (P=0.003 and P=0.02, respectively), with no other significant differences among the groups. The benefits of enhanced lifestyle counseling remained even after participants given sibutramine were excluded from the analyses. There were no significant differences between the intervention groups in the occurrence of serious adverse events.
conclusionsEnhanced weight-loss counseling helps about one third of obese patients achieve long-term, clinically meaningful weight loss. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; POWER-UP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00826774.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.