Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011
Dronedarone in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 178 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Trial for Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Dronedarone 400mg BID on Top of Standard Therapy in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Additional Risk Factors
Acute Mechanical Response to Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy
Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Dronedarone Versus Usual Care to Change and Improve Outcomes in Persons With First-Detected Atrial Fibrillation
Who cites it
178 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 535 citations in OpenAlex.
- External electrical and pharmacological cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardias: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Guideline
- Guideline
- Dronedarone versus sotalol in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Amiodarone and thyroid physiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Conventional Acupuncture for Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Guideline
- 2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of perioperative atrial fibrillation and flutter for thoracic surgical procedures.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2014Guideline
- N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids to prevent atrial fibrillation: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2013Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Dronedarone in Overweight and Obesity: Post Hoc Analysis of the ATHENA Trial.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Trial
- Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2024Trial
- Attaining sinus rhythm mediates improved outcome with early rhythm control therapy of atrial fibrillation: the EAST-AFNET 4 trial.European heart journal · 2022Trial
- Dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter across a range of renal function: a post hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2022Trial
- Composite Endpoints in Contemporary Cardiovascular Trials: Trends in Phase 3 Trials and Key Issues in Regulatory Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Expanded Tox21 Biological Assay Panel for the Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Cardiotoxicity.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Article
- Pharmacologic rhythm control for atrial fibrillation with dronedarone versus sotalol in patients with and without heart failure.Current problems in cardiology · 2026Review
- Prioritizing Discovery and Advancements in Arrhythmia Therapies: NIH/NHLBI Workshop.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: In Whom, When, and How?International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
- Which Patient Benefits from Guideline-directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure and Rate Control versus Rhythm Control in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation and What are Those Therapies?Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by[Not Available].2012
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
56 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDronedarone restores sinus rhythm and reduces hospitalization or death in intermittent atrial fibrillation. It also lowers heart rate and blood pressure and has antiadrenergic and potential ventricular antiarrhythmic effects. We hypothesized that dronedarone would reduce major vascular events in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation.
methodsWe assigned patients who were at least 65 years of age with at least a 6-month history of permanent atrial fibrillation and risk factors for major vascular events to receive dronedarone or placebo. The first coprimary outcome was stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes. The second coprimary outcome was unplanned hospitalization for a cardiovascular cause or death.
resultsAfter the enrollment of 3236 patients, the study was stopped for safety reasons. The first coprimary outcome occurred in 43 patients receiving dronedarone and 19 receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 3.94; P=0.002). There were 21 deaths from cardiovascular causes in the dronedarone group and 10 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.00 to 4.49; P=0.046), including death from arrhythmia in 13 patients and 4 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.06 to 10.00; P=0.03). Stroke occurred in 23 patients in the dronedarone group and 10 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.88; P=0.02). Hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 43 patients in the dronedarone group and 24 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.99; P=0.02).
conclusionsDronedarone increased rates of heart failure, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation who were at risk for major vascular events. Our data show that this drug should not be used in such patients. (Funded by Sanofi-Aventis; PALLAS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01151137.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.