Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22082089›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2012

Double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of the PROMETA™ protocol for methamphetamine dependence.

Walter Ling, Steven Shoptaw, Maureen Hillhouse, Michelle A Bholat, Charles Charuvastra, Keith Heinzerling, David Chim, Jeffrey Annon, Patrick T Dowling, Geetha Doraimani

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Methamphetamine-Related Disorders.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Guideline
  5. Sustained-release methylphenidate in methamphetamine dependence treatment: a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2015
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Gabapentin for the treatment of alcohol use disorder.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gabapentin Therapy in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.The primary care companion for CNS disorders · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Psychiatric Uses of Gabapentin.Innovations in clinical neuroscience
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Walter LingUniversity of California, Los Angeles, 90025, USA.
Steven Shoptaw
Maureen Hillhouse
Michelle A Bholat
Charles Charuvastra
Keith Heinzerling
David Chim
Jeffrey Annon
Patrick T Dowling
Geetha Doraimani
University of California, Los Angeles · USCommunity Hospital · US

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Cathy J Reback · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Pharmacogenomics and Medication Development for Methamphetamine DependenceK23DA023558 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HEINZERLING, KEITH GREGORY · 2008 to 2012
$848k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA023558NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PROMETA™ Protocol for treating methamphetamine dependence.

designA double-blind, placebo-controlled 108-day study with random assignment to one of two study conditions: active medication with flumazenil (2 mg infusions on days 1, 2, 3, 22, 23), gabapentin (1200 mg to day 40) and hydroxazine (50 mg to day 10) versus placebo medication (with active hydroxazine only).

settingThree substance abuse treatment clinics: two in-patient, one out-patient.

participantsTreatment-seeking, methamphetamine-dependent adults (n = 120). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was percentage of urine samples testing negative for methamphetamine during the trial.

findingsNo statistically significant between-group differences were detected in urine drug test results, craving, treatment retention or adverse events.

conclusionsThe PROMETA protocol, consisting of flumazenil, gabapentin and hydroxyzine, appears to be no more effective than placebo in reducing methamphetamine use, retaining patients in treatment or reducing methamphetamine craving.

Indexed as

MethamphetamineAdultAminesAmphetamine-Related DisordersCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleFlumazenilGABA ModulatorsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHistamine AgonistsHumansHydroxyzineInfusions, IntravenousAminesCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDrug CombinationsFlumazenilGABA ModulatorsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHistamine AgonistsHydroxyzineMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID22082089
PMCPMC4122522
OpenAlexW2163922652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.