Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22081596›Full record

ArticleGenome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics2010

Robust gene network analysis reveals alteration of the STAT5a network as a hallmark of prostate cancer.

Anupama Reddy, C Chris Huang, Huiqing Liu, Charles Delisi, Marja T Nevalainen, Sandor Szalma, Gyan Bhanot

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Targeting Transcription Factors for Cancer Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anupama ReddyBioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA. anupamar@gmail.com.
C Chris Huang
Huiqing Liu
Charles Delisi
Marja T Nevalainen
Sandor Szalma
Gyan Bhanot
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USBoston University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Stat5 in Progression of Prostate CancerR01CA113580 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI NEVALAINEN, MARJA T · 2006 to 2015
$2.7M
Novel Strategy to Sensitize Prostate Cancer Cells to RadiationR21CA178755 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI NEVALAINEN, MARJA T · 2013 to 2014
$365k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113580NCI NIH HHS R21 CA178755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We develop a general method to identify gene networks from pair-wise correlations between genes in a microarray data set and apply it to a public prostate cancer gene expression data from 69 primary prostate tumors. We define the degree of a node as the number of genes significantly associated with the node and identify hub genes as those with the highest degree. The correlation network was pruned using transcription factor binding information in VisANT (http://visant.bu.edu/) as a biological filter. The reliability of hub genes was determined using a strict permutation test. Separate networks for normal prostate samples, and prostate cancer samples from African Americans (AA) and European Americans (EA) were generated and compared. We found that the same hubs control disease progression in AA and EA networks. Combining AA and EA samples, we generated networks for low low (<7) and high (≥7) Gleason grade tumors. A comparison of their major hubs with those of the network for normal samples identified two types of changes associated with disease: (i) Some hub genes increased their degree in the tumor network compared to their degree in the normal network, suggesting that these genes are associated with gain of regulatory control in cancer (e.g. possible turning on of oncogenes). (ii) Some hubs reduced their degree in the tumor network compared to their degree in the normal network, suggesting that these genes are associated with loss of regulatory control in cancer (e.g. possible loss of tumor suppressor genes). A striking result was that for both AA and EA tumor samples, STAT5a, CEBPB and EGR1 are major hubs that gain neighbors compared to the normal prostate network. Conversely, HIF-lα is a major hub that loses connections in the prostate cancer network compared to the normal prostate network. We also find that the degree of these hubs changes progressively from normal to low grade to high grade disease, suggesting that these hubs are master regulators of prostate cancer and marks disease progression. STAT5a was identified as a central hub, with ~120 neighbors in the prostate cancer network and only 81 neighbors in the normal prostate network. Of the 120 neighbors of STAT5a, 57 are known cancer related genes, known to be involved in functional pathways associated with tumorigenesis. Our method is general and can easily be extended to identify and study networks associated with any two phenotypes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsBlack or African AmericanComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProstatic NeoplasmsSTAT5 Transcription FactorTumor Suppressor ProteinsUnited StatesWhite PeopleSTAT5A protein, humanSTAT5 Transcription FactorTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22081596
PMCPMC6035043
OpenAlexW2002057925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.