Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22080845›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2012

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe congenital neutropenia.

James A Connelly, Sung W Choi, John E Levine

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neutropenic ulcers in oncology: terminology, diagnosis, and management.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
  10. Ex Vivo Expansion and Homing of Human Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making for the neutropenic patient.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021
    Article
  12. Identification of novelCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2018
    Review
  13. Elastase inhibitors as potential therapies forJournal of leukocyte biology · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. [Advances in research on childhood neutropenia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James A ConnellyDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Sung W Choi
John E Levine
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USU-M Rogel Cancer Center

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Severe Chronic Neutropenia International RegistryR24AI049393 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DALE, DAVID CHANDLER · 2004 to 2019
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI049393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative option for patients with severe congenital neutropenia (SCN). Transplant success is dependent on identifying at-risk patients and proceeding to transplant before the development of severe infections or malignant transformation. This review focuses on recent advancements in risk stratification of SCN patients, indications for HCT, and review of published transplant studies. RECENT

findingsPatients with poor neutrophil response despite high doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are at greatest risk for malignant transformation. Other studies demonstrate elevated risk with mutations in the G-CSF receptor gene and a specific mutation in the ELANE gene. These patients are at high-risk of sepsis or leukemia development and should proceed to transplant with best available donor. As recent published studies demonstrate, HCT is highly successful in patients without leukemia and, therefore, may be considered in selected low-risk patients given the life-long risk of malignancy and infection. SUMMARY: The decision whether to proceed to HCT in healthy patients maintained on G-CSF is difficult. As transplant-related mortality continues to decrease, the role of transplant in SCN is likely to expand to more patients.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCongenital Bone Marrow Failure SyndromesGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansNeutropeniaReceptors, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorReceptors, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID22080845
PMCPMC3291495
OpenAlexW2095408469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.