Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22080506›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2012

A database of immunoglobulins with integrated tools: DIGIT.

Anna Chailyan, Anna Tramontano, Paolo Marcatili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. How repertoire data are changing antibody science.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. AbRSA: A robust tool for antibody numbering.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. AbDb: antibody structure database-a database of PDB-derived antibody structures.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Tabhu: tools for antibody humanization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna ChailyanDepartment of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le A Moro 5-00185, Italy.
Anna Tramontano
Paolo Marcatili

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DIGIT (Database of ImmunoGlobulins with Integrated Tools) database (http://biocomputing.it/digit) is an integrated resource storing sequences of annotated immunoglobulin variable domains and enriched with tools for searching and analyzing them. The annotations in the database include information on the type of antigen, the respective germline sequences and on pairing information between light and heavy chains. Other annotations, such as the identification of the complementarity determining regions, assignment of their structural class and identification of mutations with respect to the germline, are computed on the fly and can also be obtained for user-submitted sequences. The system allows customized BLAST searches and automatic building of 3D models of the domains to be performed.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinImmunoglobulin Variable RegionMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence AnalysisSoftwareSystems IntegrationTerminology as TopicImmunoglobulin Variable Region

Identifiers

PMID22080506
PMCPMC3245095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.