Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22080430›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2012

Phase 1 clinical trial of the novel proteasome inhibitor marizomib with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with melanoma, pancreatic and lung cancer based on in vitro assessments of the combination.

Michael Millward, Timothy Price, Amanda Townsend, Christopher Sweeney, Andrew Spencer, Shawgi Sukumaran, Angie Longenecker, Lonnie Lee, Ana Lay, Girish Sharma and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Marine drugs · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Marine Compounds for Melanoma Treatment and Prevention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael MillwardSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Timothy Price
Amanda Townsend
Christopher Sweeney
Andrew Spencer
Shawgi Sukumaran
Angie Longenecker
Lonnie Lee
Ana Lay
Girish Sharma
Robert M Gemmill
Harry A Drabkin
G Kenneth Lloyd
Saskia T C Neuteboom
David J McConkey
Michael A Palladino
Matthew A Spear
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · AUUniversity of South Carolina · USRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCombining proteasome and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition has been seen to provide synergistic anti-tumor activity, with complementary effects on a number of signaling pathways. The novel bi-cyclic structure of marizomib with its unique proteasome inhibition, toxicology and efficacy profiles, suggested utility in combining it with an HDAC inhibitor such as vorinostat. Thus, in this study in vitro studies assessed the potential utility of combining marizomib and vorinostat, followed by a clinical trial with the objectives of assessing the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of the combination in patients. EXPERIMENTAL

designCombinations of marizomib and vorinostat were assessed in vitro. Subsequently, in a Phase 1 clinical trial patients with melanoma, pancreatic carcinoma or Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) were given escalating doses of weekly marizomib in combination with vorinostat 300 mg daily for 16 days in 28 day cycles. In addition to standard safety studies, proteasome inhibition and pharmacokinetics were assayed.

resultsMarked synergy of marizomib and vorinostat was seen in tumor cell lines derived from patients with NSCLC, melanoma and pancreatic carcinoma. In the clinical trial, 22 patients were enrolled. Increased toxicity was not seen with the combination. Co-administration did not appear to affect the PK or PD of either drug in comparison to historical data. Although no responses were demonstrated using RECIST criteria, 61% of evaluable patients demonstrated stable disease with 39% having decreases in tumor measurements.

conclusionsTreatment of multiple tumor cell lines with marizomib and vorinostat resulted in a highly synergistic antitumor activity. The combination of full dose marizomib with vorinostat is tolerable in patients with safety findings consistent with either drug alone.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisCarcinomaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDrug CombinationsFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsLactonesLung NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CombinationsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsLactonesmarizomibProteasome InhibitorsPyrrolesVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID22080430
OpenAlexW2056181814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.