ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2012
Genetics of canine olfaction and receptor diversity.
Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Makes Canine Search and Rescue Successful? Insights into Environmental, Management, and Personality Factors.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genetic and Anatomical Determinants of Olfaction in Dogs and Wild Canids.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Breed differences in olfactory performance of dogs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Scent Detection Threshold of Trained Dogs toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Canine olfactory detection and its relevance to medical detection.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Review
- The Untrained Response of Pet Dogs to Human Epileptic Seizures.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Cadaver Dogs and the Deathly Hallows-A Survey and Literature Review on Selection and Training Procedure.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- FPR1 is the plague receptor on host immune cells.Nature · 2019Article
- Structural variation during dog domestication: insights from gray wolf and dhole genomes.National science review · 2019Article
- Innovative Diagnostic Methods for Early Prostate Cancer Detection through Urine Analysis: A Review.Cancers · 2018Review
- Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018Article
- When the Nose Doesn't Know: Canine Olfactory Function Associated With Health, Management, and Potential Links to Microbiota.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018Review
- A Test of Canine Olfactory Capacity: Comparing Various Dog Breeds and Wolves in a Natural Detection Task.PloS one · 2016Article
- Dog and mouse: toward a balanced view of the mammalian olfactory system.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2014Article
- In nutrition, can we "see" what is good for us?Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Olfaction is a particularly important sense in the dog. Humans selected for this capacity during the domestication process, and selection has continued to be employed to enhance this ability. In this review we first describe the different olfactory systems that exist and the different odorant receptors that are expressed in those systems. We then focus on the dog olfactory receptors by describing the olfactory receptor gene repertoire and its polymorphisms. Finally, we discuss the different uses of dog olfaction and the questions that still need to be studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.