ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2012
Development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Just the Best Ones" combination: a new strategy for multi-epitope vaccine candidate based on immunoinformatics analysis to induce protective immunity against MRSA infection.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Passive immunization through polyclonal antibodies against IsdE showed protective activity in an experimental S.aureus challenge model.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- The Susceptibility Profiles of Human Peripheral Blood Cells toMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- A promisingClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2025Review
- Killed whole-cell Staphylococcus aureus formulation in Montanide ISA266 and Alum adjuvants: different vaccine formulations varied in the vaccine's potency and efficacy.Immunologic research · 2025Article
- Clinical and microbiological characteristics of persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, risk factors for mortality, and the role of CD4Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Antibiotic Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infection Inhibits the Development of Protective Immunity.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Biofilm Formation by Pathogenic Bacteria: Applying aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Vaccine-enhanced disease: case studies and ethical implications for research and public health.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Identification of CD4Biotechnologia · 2021Article
- Article
- Harnessing antifungal immunity in pursuit of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine strategy.PLoS pathogens · 2020Article
- Efficacy of Active Immunization With Attenuated α-Hemolysin and Panton-Valentine Leukocidin in a Rabbit Model of Staphylococcus aureus Necrotizing Pneumonia.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus invasive infections: Evidence based on human immunity, genetics and bacterial evasion mechanisms.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Clearance of Staphylococcus aureus fromInfection and immunity · 2019Article
- Interleukin-10 (IL-10) Produced by Mutant Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1 Vaccine-Induced Memory T Cells Downregulates IL-17 Production and Abrogates the Protective Effect against Staphylococcus aureus Infection.Infection and immunity · 2019Article
- Staphylococcus aureus-specific IgA antibody in milk suppresses the multiplication of S. aureus in infected bovine udder.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- Absence of Protein A Expression Is Associated With Higher Capsule Production in Staphylococcal Isolates.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Vaccination with a live-attenuated small-colony variant improves the humoral and cell-mediated responses against Staphylococcus aureus.PloS one · 2019Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A vaccine to prevent infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus would have a tremendously beneficial impact on public health. In contrast to typical encapsulated bacterial pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and Neisseria meningitides, the capsule of S. aureus is not clearly linked to strain virulence in vivo. Furthermore, it is not clear that natural infection caused by S. aureus induces a protective humoral immune response, as does infection caused by typical encapsulated bacteria. Finally, pure B cell or antibody deficiency, in either animal models or in patients, does not predispose to more frequent or more severe S. aureus infections, as it does for infections caused by typical encapsulated bacteria. Rather, primary immune mechanisms necessary for protection against S. aureus infections include professional phagocytes and T lymphocytes (Th17 cells, in particular) which upregulate phagocytic activity. Thus, it is not clear whether an antibody-mediated neutralization of S. aureus virulence factors should be the goal of vaccination. Rather, the selection of antigenic targets which induce potent T cell immune responses that react to the broadest possible array of S. aureus strains should be the focus of antigen selection. Of particular promise is the potential to select antigens which induce both humoral and T cell-mediated immunity in order to generate immune synergy against S. aureus infections. A single-antigen vaccine may achieve this immune synergy. However, multivalent antigens may be more likely to induce both humoral and T cell immunity and to induce protection against a broader array of S. aureus isolates. A number of candidate vaccines are in development, raising the promise that effective vaccines against S. aureus will become available in the not-so-distant future. Possible development programs for such vaccines are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.