Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22080194›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2012

Development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus.

Brad Spellberg, Robert Daum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A promisingClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biofilm Formation by Pathogenic Bacteria: Applying aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Identification of CD4Biotechnologia · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Clearance of Staphylococcus aureus fromInfection and immunity · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brad SpellbergThe Division of General Internal Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bspellberg@LABioMed.org
Robert Daum

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Mechanisms of Als vaccine protection against S. aureusR01AI072052 · NIAID · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SPELLBERG, BRAD J · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
Innate Effectors of rAls3p-N Anti-Candida VaccineR01AI077681 · NIAID · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SPELLBERG, BRAD J · 2009 to 2010
$711k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072052NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vaccine to prevent infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus would have a tremendously beneficial impact on public health. In contrast to typical encapsulated bacterial pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and Neisseria meningitides, the capsule of S. aureus is not clearly linked to strain virulence in vivo. Furthermore, it is not clear that natural infection caused by S. aureus induces a protective humoral immune response, as does infection caused by typical encapsulated bacteria. Finally, pure B cell or antibody deficiency, in either animal models or in patients, does not predispose to more frequent or more severe S. aureus infections, as it does for infections caused by typical encapsulated bacteria. Rather, primary immune mechanisms necessary for protection against S. aureus infections include professional phagocytes and T lymphocytes (Th17 cells, in particular) which upregulate phagocytic activity. Thus, it is not clear whether an antibody-mediated neutralization of S. aureus virulence factors should be the goal of vaccination. Rather, the selection of antigenic targets which induce potent T cell immune responses that react to the broadest possible array of S. aureus strains should be the focus of antigen selection. Of particular promise is the potential to select antigens which induce both humoral and T cell-mediated immunity in order to generate immune synergy against S. aureus infections. A single-antigen vaccine may achieve this immune synergy. However, multivalent antigens may be more likely to induce both humoral and T cell immunity and to induce protection against a broader array of S. aureus isolates. A number of candidate vaccines are in development, raising the promise that effective vaccines against S. aureus will become available in the not-so-distant future. Possible development programs for such vaccines are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialHumansStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal VaccinesStaphylococcus aureusAntigens, BacterialStaphylococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID22080194
PMCPMC4184131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.