ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2011
A parallel algorithm for reverse engineering of biological networks.
Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The feasibility of genome-scale biological network inference using Graphics Processing Units.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2017Article
- Big Data Analytics in Healthcare.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- Designing a parallel evolutionary algorithm for inferring gene networks on the cloud computing environment.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic biological systems, such as gene regulatory networks (GRNs) and protein signaling networks, are often represented as systems of ordinary differential equations. Such equations can be utilized in reverse engineering these biological networks, specifically since identifying these networks is challenging due to the cost of the necessary experiments growing with at least the square of the size of the system. Moreover, the number of possible models, proportional to the number of directed graphs connecting nodes representing the variables in the system, suffers from combinatorial explosion as the size of the system grows. Therefore, exhaustive searches for systems of nontrivial complexity are not feasible. Here we describe a practical and scalable algorithm for determining candidate network interactions based on decomposing an N-dimensional system into N one-dimensional problems. The algorithm was tested on in silico networks based on known biological GRNs. The computational complexity of the network identification is shown to increase as N(2) while a parallel implementation achieves essentially linear speedup with the increasing number of processing cores. For each in silico network tested, the algorithm successfully predicts a candidate network that reproduces the network dynamics. This approach dramatically reduces the computational demand required for reverse engineering GRNs and produces a wealth of exploitable information in the process. Moreover, the candidate network topologies returned by the algorithm can be used to design future experiments aimed at gathering informative data capable of further resolving the true network topology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.