Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22080121›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2011

Immunologic criteria are poor predictors of virologic outcome: implications for HIV treatment monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Holly E Rawizza, Beth Chaplin, Seema T Meloni, Geoffrey Eisen, Tara Rao, Jean-Louis Sankalé, Abdoulaye Dieng-Sarr, Oche Agbaji, Daniel I Onwujekwe, Wadzani Gashau and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Holly E RawizzaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. hrawizza@hsph.harvard.edu
Beth Chaplin
Seema T Meloni
Geoffrey Eisen
Tara Rao
Jean-Louis Sankalé
Abdoulaye Dieng-Sarr
Oche Agbaji
Daniel I Onwujekwe
Wadzani Gashau
Reuben Nkado
Ernest Ekong
Prosper Okonkwo
Robert L Murphy
Phyllis J Kanki
APIN PEPFAR Team

Funding

PHS HHS U51HA02522-01-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViral load (VL) quantification is considered essential for determining antiretroviral treatment (ART) success in resource-rich countries. However, it is not widely available in resource-limited settings where the burden of human immunodeficiency virus infection is greatest. In the absence of VL monitoring, switches to second-line ART are based on World Health Organization (WHO) clinical or immunologic failure criteria.

methodsWe assessed the performance of CD4 cell criteria to predict virologic outcomes in a large ART program in Nigeria. Laboratory monitoring consists of CD4 cell count and VL at baseline, then every 6 months. Failure was defined as 2 consecutive VLs >1000 copies/mL after at least 6 months of ART. Virologic outcomes were compared with the 3 WHO-defined immunologic failure criteria.

resultsA total of 9690 patients were included in the analysis (median follow-up, 33.2 months). A total of 1225 patients experienced failure by both immunologic and virologic criteria, 872 by virologic criteria only, and 1897 by immunologic criteria only. The sensitivity of CD4 cell criteria to detect viral failure was 58%, specificity was 75%, and the positive-predictive value was 39%. For patients with both virologic and immunologic failure, VL criteria identified failure significantly earlier than CD4 cell criteria (median, 10.4 vs 15.6 months; P < .0001).

conclusionsBecause of the low sensitivity of immunologic criteria, a substantial number of failures are missed, potentially resulting in accumulation of resistance mutations. In addition, specificity and predictive values are low, which may result in large numbers of unnecessary ART switches. Monitoring solely by immunologic criteria may result in increased costs because of excess switches to more expensive ART and development of drug-resistant virus.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountDeveloping CountriesDrug MonitoringFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNigeriaPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeViral LoadAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID22080121
PMCPMC3246873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.