Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22079110›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2011

Sexually dimorphic fin regeneration in zebrafish controlled by androgen/GSK3 signaling.

Gregory Nachtrab, Michael Czerwinski, Kenneth D Poss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Intracellular pH dynamics promotes zebrafish larval tail regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hallmarks of regeneration.Cell stem cell · 2024
    Review
  9. Inter-organ communication during tissue regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sex and Regeneration.Biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Characterizing the regenerative capacity and growth patterns of the Texas blind salamander (Eurycea rathbuni).Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory NachtrabDepartment of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Michael Czerwinski
Kenneth D Poss
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Regulation of Appendage Regeneration in ZebrafishR01GM074057 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM074057NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain fish and amphibians regenerate entire fins and limbs after amputation, whereas such potential is absent in birds and limited in mammals to digit tips [1, 2]. Additionally, regenerative success can change during life stages. Anuran tadpoles gradually lose the capacity to regenerate limbs [3, 4], and digit regeneration occurs more effectively in fetal mice and human children than adults [5-8]. Little is known about mechanisms that control regenerative capacity. Here, we identify an unexpected difference between male and female zebrafish in the regenerative potential of a major appendage. Males display regenerative defects in amputated pectoral fins, caused by impaired blastemal proliferation. This regenerative failure emerges after sexual maturity, is mimicked in androgen-treated females, and is suppressed in males by androgen receptor antagonism. Androgen signaling maintains expression of dkk1b and igfbp2a, which encode secreted inhibitors of Wnt and Igf signaling, respectively. Furthermore, the regulatory target of Wnts and Igfs, GSK3β, is inefficiently inactivated in male fin regenerates compared with females. Pharmacological inhibition of GSK3 in males increases blastemal proliferation and restores regenerative pattern. Our findings identify a natural sex bias in appendage regenerative capacity and indicate an underlying regulatory circuit in which androgen locally restricts key morphogenetic programs after amputation.

Indexed as

RegenerationSignal TransductionAndrogensAnimal FinsAnimalsFemaleGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 2Intercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMolecular Sequence DataReceptors, AndrogenSex CharacteristicsSexual MaturationZebrafishAndrogensdkk1b protein, zebrafishGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaGSK3B protein, humanGsk3b protein, mouseInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 2Intercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsReceptors, AndrogenZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22079110
PMCPMC3236601
OpenAlexW2050008248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.