ArticleContraception2011
Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion.
Article in Contraception, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01986439 (The Contraceptive Choice Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Contraceptive Choice Project
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2012Trial
- Article
- Contraceptive Use Before and After Abortion: A Cross-Sectional Study from Nigeria and Côte d'Ivoire.Studies in family planning · 2022Article
- Effect of Previous Adverse Reproductive Health Outcomes on Young Women's Engagement in a Health Coaching Intervention to Improve Contraceptive Continuation.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2021Article
- Survival Analysis of Patient Contraceptive Choice Method at Time of Abortion - Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 2010-December 2016.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2020Article
- Determinants of long acting reversible contraception utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based case control study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Prevalence and correlates of postabortion long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among young women (24 and below) in Nepal: Strategy in the search for improvements.Reproductive health · 2019Article
- Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina.Southern medical journal · 2018Article
- Telephone or integrated contraception counselling before abortion: impact on method choice and receipt.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2018Article
- Contraceptive Use over Five Years After Receipt Or Denial of Abortion Services.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2018Article
- Contraception after Abortion and Risk of Repeated Unintended Pregnancy among Health Plan Members.The Permanente journal · 2018Article
- Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2017Article
- Contraceptive care at the time of medical abortion: experiences of women and health professionals in a hospital or community sexual and reproductive health context.Contraception · 2016Article
- Access to Contraceptives in Countries With Restrictive Abortion Laws: The Case of Brazil.Health care for women international · 2016Article
- Contraceptive use following spontaneous and induced abortion and its association with family planning services in primary health care: results from a Brazilian longitudinal study.Reproductive health · 2015Article
- The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland.Population studies · 2015Article
- The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learned.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology · 2014Article
- Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2013Observational
- Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.Contraception · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen undergoing induced abortion may be more motivated to choose long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including the intrauterine device (IUD) and implant, than women without a history of abortion. Our objective was to determine whether the contraceptive method chosen is influenced by a recent history of induced abortion and access to immediate postabortion contraception. STUDY
designThis was a subanalysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. We compared contraception chosen by women with a recent history of abortion to women without a recent history. Participants with a recent history of abortion were divided into immediate postabortion contraception and delayed-start contraception groups.
resultsData were available for 5083 women: 3410 women without a recent abortion history, 937 women who received immediate postabortion contraception and 736 women who received delayed-start postabortion contraception. Women offered immediate postabortion contraception were more than three times as likely to choose an IUD [adjusted relative risk (RR(adj)) 3.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.67-4.85] and 50% more likely to choose the implant (RR(adj) 1.51, 95%CI 1.12-2.03) compared to women without a recent abortion. There was no difference in contraceptive method selected among women offered delayed-start postabortion contraception compared to women without a recent abortion.
conclusionWomen offered immediate postabortion contraception are more likely to choose the IUD and implant than women without a recent abortion history. Increasing access to immediate postabortion LARC is essential to preventing repeat unintended pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.