Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22078015›Full record

SynthesisJournal of minimally invasive gynecology

A systematic review comparing hysterectomy with less-invasive treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding.

Kristen A Matteson, Husam Abed, Thomas L Wheeler, Vivian W Sung, David D Rahn, Joseph I Schaffer, Ethan M Balk, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding.Women's health (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  12. Abnormal uterine bleeding: Taking the stress out of controlling the flow.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015
    Article
  13. Prevalence and knowledge of heavy menstrual bleeding among African American women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Hysterectomy on Sexual Function.Current sexual health reports
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen A MattesonWomen and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Husam Abed
Thomas L Wheeler
Vivian W Sung
David D Rahn
Joseph I Schaffer
Ethan M Balk
Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group
Brown University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USHenry Ford Health System · USPrisma Health · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

A Comprehensive Patient Based Outcome Measure for Heavy Menstral BleedingK23HD057957 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI MATTESON, KRISTEN A · 2008 to 2012
$797k
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Functioning for Female Pelvic Floor DisordersK23HD060665 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI SUNG, VIVIAN W · 2009 to 2013
$671k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD057957NICHD NIH HHS K23HD057957NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD060665NICHD NIH HHS K23HD060665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo compare hysterectomy with less-invasive alternatives for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in 7 clinically important domains.

designSystematic review.

settingRandomized clinical trials comparing bleeding, quality of life, pain, sexual health, satisfaction, need for subsequent surgery, and adverse events between hysterectomy and less-invasive treatment options. PATIENTS: Women with AUB, predominantly from ovulatory disorders and endometrial causes.

interventionsSystematic review of the literature (from inception to January 2011) comparing hysterectomy with alternatives for AUB treatment. Eligible trials were extracted into standardized forms. Trials were graded with a predefined 3-level rating, and the strengths of evidence for each outcome were evaluated with the Grades for Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsNine randomized clinical trials (18 articles) were eligible. Endometrial ablation, levonorgestrel intrauterine system, and medications were associated with lower risk of adverse events but higher risk of additional treatments than hysterectomy. Compared to ablation, hysterectomy had superior long-term pain and bleeding control. Compared with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, hysterectomy had superior control of bleeding. No other differences between treatments were found.

conclusionLess-invasive treatment options for AUB result in improvement in quality of life but carry significant risk of retreatment caused by unsatisfactory results. Although hysterectomy is the most effective treatment for AUB, it carries the highest risk for adverse events.

Indexed as

Endometrial Ablation TechniquesHysterectomyIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedAbdominal PainContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHumansLevonorgestrelQuality of LifeSexual BehaviorUterine HemorrhageContraceptive Agents, FemaleLevonorgestrel

Identifiers

PMID22078015
PMCPMC3269666
OpenAlexW2072672738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.