Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22078011›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2011

Minimal residual disease and circulating tumor cells in breast cancer.

Michail Ignatiadis, Monica Reinholz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Circulating Tumor Cell Phenotyping via High-Throughput Acoustic Separation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Luminal breast cancer: from biology to treatment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michail IgnatiadisMedical Oncology Department and Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, 121 Boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Michail.Ignatiadis@bordet.be
Monica Reinholz
Institut Jules Bordet · BEMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor cell dissemination in bone marrow or other organs is thought to represent an important step in the metastatic process. The detection of bone marrow disseminated tumor cells is associated with worse outcome in early breast cancer. Moreover, the detection of peripheral blood circulating tumor cells is an adverse prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer, and emerging data suggest that this is also true for early disease. Beyond enumeration, the characterization of these cells has the potential to improve risk assessment, treatment selection and monitoring, and the development of novel therapeutic agents, and to advance our understanding of the biology of metastasis.

Indexed as

Cytological TechniquesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorBlood CellsBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DesignFemaleHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22078011
PMCPMC3262191
OpenAlexW2115285865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.