ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2012
Allometric scaling of 6-min walking distance by body mass as a standardized measure of exercise capacity in healthy adults.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Allometric Association between Six-Minute Walk Distance and Both Body Size and Shape in Young Obese Girls.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intensity and physiological responses to the 6-minute walk test in middle-aged and older adults: a comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body mass (BM) is a confounding variable in human performance. We hypothesized that adjusting 6-min walk distance (6MWD) for BM differences using allometric scaling would allow meaningful individual and group comparisons. We aimed to use allometric scaling of 6MWD to BM to provide an index for comparing walking performance in middle-aged and older adults. One hundred and twenty subjects (40-87 years) participated. Anthropometry, spirometry, and two walk tests were evaluated. We adjusted 6MWD to BM, gender, and age using an allometric procedure. The allometric exponents were prospectively applied in a validation sample of 44 healthy subjects. Body mass presented significant negative correlation (p < 0.01) with 6MWD · BM(-1) in middle-aged and older adults (r = -0.70 and -0.46, respectively). The allometric exponent (b) for 6MWD was significantly higher for older than middle-aged adults (0.35 ± 0.20 vs. 0.11 ± 0.08, respectively). The resulting BM exponents were similar in male and female subjects (0.22 ± 0.13 and 0.17 ± 0.09, respectively). The correlation between 6MWD · BM(-b ) and BM using the exponents (0.11 or 0.35) was not statistically different from zero (r = 0.00) in the validation sample, suggesting that allometric analysis did not penalize the subjects based on BM. Allometric scaling of 6MWD in middle-aged and older adults may be useful for evaluating walking performance free of the confounding effect of BM, even in the absence of a table of norms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.