Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22075596›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Simultaneous detection of six diarrhea-causing bacterial pathogens with an in-house PCR-luminex assay.

Jie Liu, Jean Gratz, Athanasia Maro, Happy Kumburu, Gibson Kibiki, Mami Taniuchi, Arif Mahmud Howlader, Shihab U Sobuz, Rashidul Haque, Kaisar A Talukder and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating next-generation sequencing for direct clinical diagnostics in diarrhoeal disease.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jie LiuDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine,a and Department of Pathology,e University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. jl5yj@virginia.edu
Jean Gratz
Athanasia Maro
Happy Kumburu
Gibson Kibiki
Mami Taniuchi
Arif Mahmud Howlader
Shihab U Sobuz
Rashidul Haque
Kaisar A Talukder
Shahida Qureshi
Anita Zaidi
Doris M Haverstick
Eric R Houpt
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZOffice of Infectious Diseases · USAga Khan University · PKUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Comprehensive Molecular Diagnosis for Food and Waterborne EnteropathogensU01AI075396 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOUPT, ERIC R · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Global Infectious Disease Research Training Program AwardD43TW008270 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOUPT, ERIC R · 2010 to 2014
$735k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008270NIAID NIH HHS AI075396-S1NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI075396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhea can be caused by a range of pathogens, including several bacteria. Conventional diagnostic methods, such as culture, biochemical tests, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), are laborious. We developed a 7-plex PCR-Luminex assay to simultaneously screen for several of the major diarrhea-causing bacteria directly in fecal specimens, including pathogenic Aeromonas, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Salmonella, Shigella, enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Vibrio, and Yersinia. We included an extrinsic control to verify extraction and amplification. The assay was first validated with reference strains or isolates and exhibited a limit of detection of 10(3) to 10(5) CFU/g of stool for each pathogen as well as quantitative detection up to 10(9) CFU/g. A total of 205 clinical fecal specimens from individuals with diarrhea, previously cultured for enteric pathogens and tested for Campylobacter by ELISA, were evaluated. Using these predicate methods as standards, sensitivities and specificities of the PCR-Luminex assay were 89% and 94% for Aeromonas, 89% and 93% for Campylobacter, 96% and 95% for Salmonella, 94% and 94% for Shigella, 92% and 97% for Vibrio, and 100% and 100% for Yersinia, respectively. All discrepant results were further examined by singleplex real-time PCR assays targeting different gene regions, which revealed 89% (55/62 results) concordance with the PCR-Luminex assay. The fluorescent signals obtained with this approach exhibited a statistically significant correlation with the cycle threshold (C(T)) values from the cognate real-time PCR assays (P < 0.05). This multiplex PCR-Luminex assay enables sensitive, specific, and quantitative detection of the major bacterial causes of gastroenteritis.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesDiarrheaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22075596
PMCPMC3256708
OpenAlexW2026425515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.