Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22075592›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Comparison of the cobas Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test with the hybrid capture 2 and linear array HPV DNA tests.

Julia C Gage, Mark Sadorra, Brandon J Lamere, Randi Kail, Carrie Aldrich, Walter Kinney, Barbara Fetterman, Thomas Lorey, Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00435214 (The HPV Persistence and Progression), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00435214 completednot on this map

The HPV Persistence and Progression (PaP) Cohort at Kaiser Permanente Northern California

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2007 to 2020Enrolled131,110ConditionsCervical Neoplasia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HPV73 a nonvaccine type causes cervical cancer.International journal of cancer · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of the Roche Cobas® 4800 HPV assay to Roche Amplicor for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Large-Scale Evaluation of the cobas HPV Test.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Julia C GageDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. gagej@mail.nih.gov
Mark Sadorra
Brandon J Lamere
Randi Kail
Carrie Aldrich
Walter Kinney
Barbara Fetterman
Thomas Lorey
Mark Schiffman
Philip E Castle
PaP Cohort Study Group
Kaiser Permanente · USGeneTrace Systems (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USAmerican Society for Clinical Pathology · USVentana Research Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cobas human papillomavirus (HPV) test (cobas) was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and identifies HPV16 and HPV18 separately as well as detecting a pool of 11 HR-HPV genotypes (HPV31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, -59, -68) and also HPV66. We compared cobas, Linear Array (LA), and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assays for detection of carcinogenic HPV DNA, and cobas and LA for detection of HPV16 and HPV18 DNA, among the first 1,852 women enrolled in the HPV Persistence and Progression Cohort (PaP Cohort) study. Specimens were tested by all 3 assays 1 year after an HC2-positive result. In 1,824 specimens with cobas results, cobas had an 85.9% agreement with HC2 and 91.0% agreement with LA for carcinogenic HPV detection. When results between cobas and HC2 disagreed, cobas tended to call more women HPV positive (P < 0.01). Categorizing cobas and LA results hierarchically according to cancer risk (HPV16, HPV18, other carcinogenic HPV genotypes, or carcinogen negative), there was a 90% agreement for all categories of HPV (n = 1,824). We found good agreement between the two U.S. FDA-approved HPV tests, with discrepancies between the two assays due to specific characteristics of the individual assays. Additional studies are needed to compare HC2 and cobas for detecting and predicting CIN3 to understand the clinical implications of the discrepant test results between the two tests.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNA, ViralFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUnited StatesVirologyDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID22075592
PMCPMC3256696
OpenAlexW2122625275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.