ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2012
Influence of RNA labeling on expression profiling of microRNAs.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs as Predictors of Future Uterine Malignancy in Endometrial Hyperplasia without Atypia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although a number of technical parameters are now being examined to optimize microRNA profiling experiments, it is unknown whether reagent or component changes to the labeling step affect starting RNA requirements or microarray performance. Human brain/lung samples were each labeled in duplicate, at 1.0, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.1 μg of total RNA, by means of two kits that use the same labeling procedure but differ in the reagent composition used to label microRNAs. Statistical measures of reliability and validity were used to evaluate microarray data. Cross-platform confirmation was accomplished using TaqMan microRNA assays. Synthetic microRNA spike-in experiments were also performed to establish the microarray signal dynamic range using the ligation-modified kit. Technical replicate correlations of signal intensity values were high using both kits, but improved with the ligation-modified assay. The drop in detection call sensitivity and miRNA gene list correlations, when using reduced amounts of standard-labeled RNA, was considerably improved with the ligation-modified kit. Microarray signal dynamic range was found to be linear across three orders of magnitude from 4.88 to 5000 attomoles. Thus, optimization of the microRNA labeling reagent can result in at least a 10-fold decrease in microarray total RNA requirements with little compromise to data quality. Clinical investigations bottlenecked by the amount of starting material may use a ligation mix modification strategy to reduce total RNA requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.