Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22073923›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2011

The impact of laxative use upon symptoms in patients with proven slow transit constipation.

Phil G Dinning, Linda Hunt, David Z Lubowski, Jamshid S Kalantar, Ian J Cook, Mike P Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Treatment of fecal impaction in children using combined polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulphate.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Article
  6. Constipation in specialized palliative care: factors related to constipation when applying different definitions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Response to "A cross-sectional study of constipation and laxative use in advanced cancer patients: insights for revision of current practise".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  10. The physiology of human defecation.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Phil G DinningDepartment of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia. phil.dinning@flinders.edu.au
Linda Hunt
David Z Lubowski
Jamshid S Kalantar
Ian J Cook
Mike P Jones
UNSW Sydney · AUMacquarie University · AUNepean Hospital · AUSt George Hospital · AUSt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConstipation severity is often defined by symptoms including feelings of complete evacuation, straining, stool frequency and consistency. These descriptors are mostly obtained in the absence of laxative use. For many constipated patients laxative usage is ubiquitous and long standing. Our aim was to determine the impact of laxative use upon the stereotypic constipation descriptors.

methodsPatients with confirmed slow transit constipation completed 3-week stool diaries, detailing stool frequency and form, straining, laxative use and pain and bloating scores. Each diary day was classified as being under laxative affect (laxative affected days) or not (laxative unaffected days). Unconditional logistic regression was used to assess the affects of laxatives on constipation symptoms.

resultsNinety four patients with scintigraphically confirmed slow transit constipation were enrolled in the study. These patients reported a stool frequency of 5.6 ± 4.3 bowel motions/week, only 21 patients reported <3 bowel motions/week. Similarly, 21 patients reported a predominant hard stool at defecation. The majority (90%) of patients reported regular straining. A regular feeling of complete evacuation was reported in just 7 patients. Daily pain and/or bloating were reported by 92% of patients. When compared with laxative unaffected days, on the laxative affected days patients had a higher stool frequency (OR 2.23; P <0.001) and were more likely to report loose stools (OR 1.64; P <0.009). Laxatives did not increase the number of bowel actions associated with a feeling of complete evacuation. Laxative use had no affect upon straining, pain or bloating scores

conclusionsThe reporting of frequent and loose stools with abdominal pain and/or bloating is common in patients with slow transit constipation. While laxative use is a significant contributor to altering stool frequency and form, laxatives have no apparent affect on pain or bloating or upon a patients feeling of complete evacuation. These factors need to be taken into account when using constipation symptoms to define this population.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal TransitAbdominal PainAdultConstipationDefecationFemaleHumansLaxativesLogistic ModelsMaleLaxatives

Identifiers

PMID22073923
PMCPMC3226636
OpenAlexW2027798571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.