Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22073152›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Predicting in vivo anti-hepatofibrotic drug efficacy based on in vitro high-content analysis.

Baixue Zheng, Looling Tan, Xuejun Mo, Weimiao Yu, Yan Wang, Lisa Tucker-Kellogg, Roy E Welsch, Peter T C So, Hanry Yu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting metabolic dysregulation for fibrosis therapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Baixue ZhengComputation and Systems Biology Program, Singapore-MIT Alliance, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Looling Tan
Xuejun Mo
Weimiao Yu
Yan Wang
Lisa Tucker-Kellogg
Roy E Welsch
Peter T C So
Hanry Yu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsMany anti-fibrotic drugs with high in vitro efficacies fail to produce significant effects in vivo. The aim of this work is to use a statistical approach to design a numerical predictor that correlates better with in vivo outcomes.

methodsHigh-content analysis (HCA) was performed with 49 drugs on hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) LX-2 stained with 10 fibrotic markers. ~0.3 billion feature values from all cells in >150,000 images were quantified to reflect the drug effects. A systematic literature search on the in vivo effects of all 49 drugs on hepatofibrotic rats yields 28 papers with histological scores. The in vivo and in vitro datasets were used to compute a single efficacy predictor (E(predict)).

resultsWe used in vivo data from one context (CCl(4) rats with drug treatments) to optimize the computation of E(predict). This optimized relationship was independently validated using in vivo data from two different contexts (treatment of DMN rats and prevention of CCl(4) induction). A linear in vitro-in vivo correlation was consistently observed in all the three contexts. We used E(predict) values to cluster drugs according to efficacy; and found that high-efficacy drugs tended to target proliferation, apoptosis and contractility of HSCs.

conclusionsThe E(predict) statistic, based on a prioritized combination of in vitro features, provides a better correlation between in vitro and in vivo drug response than any of the traditional in vitro markers considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCarbon TetrachlorideCell LineHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLiver CirrhosisRatsBiomarkersCarbon Tetrachloride

Identifiers

PMID22073152
PMCPMC3206809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.