Trial reportPloS one2011
Effects of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive and emotional functioning in young adults--a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Effect of vitamin D supplementation on the incidence and prognosis of depression: An updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of vitamin D on cognitive functions in healthy individuals: A systematic review in randomized controlled clinical trials.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Vitamin D Supplementation and Cognition in Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.CNS drugs · 2021Pooled it
- Relationship between vitamin D deficiency and psychophysiological variables: a systematic review of the literature.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021Pooled it
- Vitamin D and cognitive function: A Mendelian randomisation study.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Non-skeletal health effects of vitamin D supplementation: A systematic review on findings from meta-analyses summarizing trial data.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Vitamin D and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing studies with and without biological flaws.Nutrients · 2014Pooled it
- Vitamin D supplementation for depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Psychosomatic medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- The effect of vitamin D supplementation on mental and functional health outcomes in African Americans with type 2 diabetes.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2025Trial
- Effects of vitamin D supplementation on depression and some selected pro-inflammatory biomarkers: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.BMC psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Effect of vitamin D on cognitive decline: results from two ancillary studies of the VITAL randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Effect of omega-3 and vitamin D co-supplementation on psychological distress in reproductive-aged women with pre-diabetes and hypovitaminosis D: A randomized controlled trial.Brain and behavior · 2021Trial
- Vitamin D Status and Physical Activity during Wintertime in Forensic Inpatients-A Randomized Clinical Trial.Nutrients · 2021Trial
- Vitamin D Supplementation and Cognition in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Control Trial.Journal of diabetes research · 2019Trial
- Dose ranging effects of vitamin D3 on the geriatric depression score: A clinical trial.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2018Trial
- Fatty fish intake and cognitive function: FINS-KIDS, a randomized controlled trial in preschool children.BMC medicine · 2018Trial
- Vitamin D Supplementation in Chronic Schizophrenia Patients Treated with Clozapine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.EBioMedicine · 2017Trial
- Trial
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidemiological research links vitamin D status to various brain-related outcomes. However, few trials examine whether supplementation can improve such outcomes and none have examined effects on cognition. This study examined whether Vitamin D supplementation led to improvements in diverse measures of cognitive and emotional functioning, and hypothesised that supplementation would lead to improvements in these outcomes compared to placebo. METHODS/PRINCIPAL
findingsHealthy young adults were recruited to a parallel-arm, double-blind trial conducted at The University of Queensland. Participants were randomly allocated to receive Vitamin D (one capsule daily, containing 5000 IU cholecalciferol) or identical placebo capsule for six weeks. All participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. Primary outcome measures assessed at baseline and 6 weeks were working memory, response inhibition and cognitive flexibility. Secondary outcomes were: hallucination-proneness, psychotic-like experiences, and ratings of depression, anxiety and anger. 128 participants were recruited, randomised and included in primary analyses (vitamin D n = 63; placebo n = 65). Despite significant increases in vitamin D status in the active group, no significant changes were observed in working memory (F = 1.09; p = 0.30), response inhibition (F = 0.82; p = 0.37), cognitive flexibility (F = 1.37; p = 0.24) or secondary outcomes. No serious adverse effects were reported.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that vitamin D supplementation does not influence cognitive or emotional functioning in healthy young adults. Future controlled trials in targeted populations of interest are required to determine whether supplementation can improve functioning in these domains. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12610000318088.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.