ArticlePLoS genetics2011
Over-expression of DSCAM and COL6A2 cooperatively generates congenital heart defects.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Future Directions for Studying the Potential of Mammalian Dscam in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Alzheimer's Disease: Insights from Dose Sensitivity.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Article
- In Vivo Models of Cardiovascular Disease:Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Interactive visualization and interpretation of pangenome graphs by linear reference-based coordinate projection and annotation integration.Genome research · 2025Article
- Exploring perspectives of Dscam for cognitive deficits: a review of multifunction for regulating neural wiring in homeostasis.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Review
- Choroid plexus defects in Down syndrome brain organoids enhance neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2.Science advances · 2024Article
- Increased endothelial sclerostin caused by elevated DSCAM mediates multiple trisomy 21 phenotypes.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- Genetic determinants of blood pressure and heart rate identified through ENU-induced mutagenesis with automated meiotic mapping.Science advances · 2024Article
- The role of Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule in Down syndrome.Medical review (2021) · 2024Review
- Rare genomic copy number variants implicate new candidate genes for bicuspid aortic valve.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- The Drosophila homolog of APP promotes Dscam expression to drive axon terminal growth, revealing interaction between Down syndrome genes.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- Impact of converging sociocultural and substance-related trends on US autism rates: combined geospatiotemporal and causal inferential analysis.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Genetics and Molecular Basis of Congenital Heart Defects in Down Syndrome: Role of Extracellular Matrix Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Dscam1 overexpression impairs the function of the gut nervous system in Drosophila.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023Article
- Epigenomic and Other Evidence for Cannabis-Induced Aging Contextualized in a Synthetic Epidemiologic Overview of Cannabinoid-Related Teratogenesis and Cannabinoid-Related Carcinogenesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Identification of Factors Driving Doxorubicin-Resistant Ewing Tumor Cells to Survival.Cancers · 2022Article
- The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Biology in balance: human diploid genome integrity, gene dosage, and genomic medicine.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology in Down syndrome.Physiological research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A significant current challenge in human genetics is the identification of interacting genetic loci mediating complex polygenic disorders. One of the best characterized polygenic diseases is Down syndrome (DS), which results from an extra copy of part or all of chromosome 21. A short interval near the distal tip of chromosome 21 contributes to congenital heart defects (CHD), and a variety of indirect genetic evidence suggests that multiple candidate genes in this region may contribute to this phenotype. We devised a tiered genetic approach to identify interacting CHD candidate genes. We first used the well vetted Drosophila heart as an assay to identify interacting CHD candidate genes by expressing them alone and in all possible pairwise combinations and testing for effects on rhythmicity or heart failure following stress. This comprehensive analysis identified DSCAM and COL6A2 as the most strongly interacting pair of genes. We then over-expressed these two genes alone or in combination in the mouse heart. While over-expression of either gene alone did not affect viability and had little or no effect on heart physiology or morphology, co-expression of the two genes resulted in ≈50% mortality and severe physiological and morphological defects, including atrial septal defects and cardiac hypertrophy. Cooperative interactions between DSCAM and COL6A2 were also observed in the H9C2 cardiac cell line and transcriptional analysis of this interaction points to genes involved in adhesion and cardiac hypertrophy. Our success in defining a cooperative interaction between DSCAM and COL6A2 suggests that the multi-tiered genetic approach we have taken involving human mapping data, comprehensive combinatorial screening in Drosophila, and validation in vivo in mice and in mammalian cells lines should be applicable to identifying specific loci mediating a broad variety of other polygenic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.