ArticleSurgery today2012
Total resection of the right hepatic vein drainage area with the aid of three-dimensional computed tomography.
Article in Surgery today, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Hobson's choice two-stage hepatectomy for multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases with portal vein embolization: report of two cases.Surgery today · 2015Article
- Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of variations in the middle hepatic vein tributaries: proposed new classification.Surgery today · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe analyzed the feasibility and safety of our preliminary surgical approach for total hepatic resection of the right hepatic vein drainage area (THR-RHV) with the aid of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) guidance.
methodsClinical findings and 3D-CT volumetry results were investigated in five patients who underwent THR-RHV for a hepatic malignant tumor close to the right hepatic vein (RHV).
resultsThe mean estimated remnant liver volume after a conventional right lobectomy was 474 ml, whereas that after THR-RHV was 614 ml, indicating that 140 ml (13.8%) of additional liver volume had been preserved by performing THR-RHV. The median operative time, mean ischemic time, and mean blood loss during surgery were 406 min, 51 min, and 587 ml, respectively. Histological examinations confirmed a negative surgical margin in all five patients. The mean liver volume estimated by 3D-CT was 458 ml, whereas the mean actual resected liver volume was 468 g, resulting in a mean error ratio of 3.1%.
conclusionsTHR-RHV allowed for a higher remnant liver volume than that after conventional right lobectomy of the liver, and proved feasible with acceptable perioperative results. This technique thus promotes both safety and curability for patients with a tumor close to the RHV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22072147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.