Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22072050›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Thyroid cancer patients' involvement in adjuvant radioactive iodine treatment decision-making and decision regret: an exploratory study.

A M Sawka, S Straus, A Gafni, S Meiyappan, D David, G Rodin, J D Brierley, R W Tsang, L Thabane, L Rotstein and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06980103 (Use of a Decision Aid to Resolve Uncertainty About Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients With Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06980103 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Use of a Decision Aid to Resolve Uncertainty About Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients With Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer: The Radiance Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2025 to 2029Enrolled408ConditionsThyroid CancerArmsDecision Aid, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Patient-Perceived Lack of Choice in Receipt of Radioactive Iodine for Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A M SawkaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, 12 EN-212, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. sawkaam@yahoo.com
S Straus
A Gafni
S Meiyappan
D David
G Rodin
J D Brierley
R W Tsang
L Thabane
L Rotstein
S Ezzat
D P Goldstein
University Health Network · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research CNI-80701Canadian Institutes of Health Research FRN 94609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe explored regret in thyroid cancer patients, relating to the decision to accept or reject adjuvant radioactive iodine treatment.

methodsWe studied patients with a recent diagnosis of early stage papillary thyroid carcinoma, in whom treatment decisions on adjuvant radioactive iodine had been finalized. Participants completed a Decision Regret Scale questionnaire. We asked the participants to identify who made the final decision about radioactive iodine treatment. We explored the relationship between decision regret and a) degree of patient involvement in decision-making and b) receipt of radioactive iodine treatment.

resultsWe included 44 individuals, more than half of whom received adjuvant radioactive iodine treatment (26/44). Decision regret was generally low (mean 22.1, standard deviation [SD] 13.0). Participants reported that the final treatment decision was made by the following: patient and doctor (52.3%, 23/44), completely the patient (27.3%, 12/44), or completely the physician (20.5%, 9/44). Decision regret significantly differed according to who made the final decision: the patient (mean 19.0, SD 11.3), patient and doctor (mean 19.5, SD 7.4), and the doctor (mean 32.9, SD 20.37) (F = 4.569; degrees of freedom = 2, 41; p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in decision regret between patients who received radioactive iodine and those who did not (mean difference -2.5; 95% confidence interval -10.6, 5.6; p = 0.540).

conclusionThyroid cancer patients who reported being involved in the final treatment decision on adjuvant radioactive iodine had less regret than those who did not.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultDecision MakingEmotionsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIodine RadioisotopesMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSurveys and QuestionnairesThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsIodine Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID22072050
PMCPMC3271222
OpenAlexW2004172854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.