ArticleDer Anaesthesist2012
[Outpatient anesthesia for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: results of a national survey].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany there is currently no national standard for the management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). The object of this survey was to obtain information on the treatment concept for patients with OSAS and to report on the current practice in Germany.
methodsData collection was obtained through an online questionnaire. A total of 12,113 members of the supporting anesthesia societies from all over Germany were invited to participate via e-mail. Additionally an announcement was made in a professional journal.
resultsA total of 1,671 questionnaires were analyzed. The average age of the respondents was 45 years, 64% were male and 36% were female. The average work experience was 16 years and 85% of the respondents were consultants. In total 85% of anesthesiologists were predominantly working in inpatient care and 12% were predominantly active in outpatient care. Of the respondents 63% preferred regional anesthesia, 20% preferred general anesthesia for patients with OSAS and 17% did not have a preference for a specific anesthesia procedure. Outpatient surgery for patients with OSAS was performed by 72% of the respondents using regional anesthesia and by 55% of the respondents using local anesthesia with sedation. Of the anesthesiologists 49% consented to outpatient surgery using general anesthesia and 14% to interventions involving the airways. Compared to anesthesiologists working predominantly in inpatient departments, those working predominantly in outpatient departments treated patients with OSAS more frequently on an outpatient basis, used general anesthesia significantly more often, discharged those patients significantly earlier and observed less complications.
conclusionsThis survey shows that outpatient surgery for patients with sleep apnea is common practice in Germany. It is also performed when patients have moderate or severe OSAS and for respiratory tract surgery. This means that the management is not conform to the guidelines of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.