ReviewDer Anaesthesist2011
[Update: studies in intensive care medicine. Results of the last 12 months].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensive care medicine plays an important role in the medical care of patients as well as the economic success of hospitals. Knowledge and implementation of recent relevant scientific evidence are prerequisites for high quality care in intensive care medicine. The aim of this review is to present an overview of the most important publications in intensive care medicine published in 2010 and the first half of the year 2011 and to comment on their attributable clinical relevance for intensive care practitioners. In 2010 and up to June 2011 many studies with high patient numbers have been published. The main topics were the treatment of respiratory failure, sepsis and investigations to improve analgosedation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.