Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22071854›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Analgesia for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling.

Faris Mujezinovic, Zarko Alfirevic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03140293 (A Randomized Trial to Determine if Local Anesthesia Decreases Pain Perception in Women Undergoing Chorionic Villus Sampling), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03140293 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Trial to Determine if Local Anesthesia Decreases Pain Perception in Women Undergoing Chorionic Villus Sampling

TypeinterventionalSponsorAngela BiancoRan2016 to 2017Enrolled120ConditionsChorionic Villi SamplingArmsLidocaine injection, Gebauer Ethyl Chloride Spray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A Pilot Study of Partner Chair Massage Effects on Perinatal Mood, Anxiety, and Pain.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Faris MujezinovicUniversity Clinical Department ofGynecology and Perinatology, University Clinical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Zarko Alfirevic
University Clinical Centre Maribor · SIUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBesides risks of miscarriage, pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) are also concerned about pain associated with these procedures. Currently, approaches to analgesia can be categorised in two broad categories - non-pharmacological and pharmacological agents.

objectivesTo evaluate whether different methods of analgesia have any impact on pain reduction during amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials comparing different method of analgesia for amniocentesis or CVS. We also include trials with quasi-randomised designs, but analyse and report their results separately. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors assessed eligibility and trial quality and performed data extraction. MAIN

resultsWe included a total of five randomised studies (involving 805 women) evaluating different methods of analgesia for amniocentesis; there were no studies in women undergoing CVS.One RCT (N = 203) and one quasi-randomised study (N = 220) compared infiltrative local anaesthesia with no anaesthesia and found no statistical difference in experienced pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS) (mean differences (MD) -2.50 and 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.98 to 1.98 and -2.67 to 5.07).One study (N = 200) compared light leg rubbing versus no intervention during amniocentesis and found no change in experienced anxiety (MD 0.2; 95% CI -0.63 to 1.03) or VAS pain score (MD 0.3; 95% CI -0.35 to 0.95) during amniocentesis.Another study with 62 patients did not find any benefit of using subfreezing temperature needle during amniocentesis in terms of decreased VAS pain score (MD -0.8; 95% CI -1.8 to 0.2). In addition, there was no difference between anticipated and actual pain (MD 0.4; 95% CI -0.82 to 1.62) (before/after comparison).There was also no difference in VAS pain scores in the study with 120 participants comparing lidocaine-prilocaine analgesic cream to placebo cream before amniocentesis (MD -0.6; 95% CI -1.44 to 0.24). AUTHORS'

conclusionsIn general, women who undergo amniocentesis could be informed that pain during procedure is minor and that there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of local anaesthetics, leg rubbing or subfreezing the needle for pain reduction during procedure.

Indexed as

AmniocentesisAnalgesiaAnesthesia, LocalChorionic Villi SamplingCryoanesthesiaFemaleHumansLidocainePainPregnancyPrilocaineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicLidocainePrilocaine

Identifiers

PMID22071854
PMCPMC12286571
OpenAlexW1896775861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.